Talk:Ilfracombe branch line

Trains: in UK Low‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	February 25, 2018

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).

This article lacks references.

Devon Low‑importance

	Devon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Devon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Devon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DevonWikipedia:WikiProject DevonTemplate:WikiProject DevonDevon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Ilfracombe Branch Line.

Carr Lane

The Carr Lane station is in Lancashire. That seems strange. JHJPDJKDKHI! 19:47, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well-spotted. Now removed. Someone copied the table from The Garstang and Knott End Railway, and Carr Lane is (was) on that line. :I have also changed the sub-title 'Principal stations' to 'Stations', as I'm not aware that there were any others not already listed!

Not sure if both 'Quay' and 'Town' stations should appear on the list, but then I'm not really sure that the list needs to be there in the first place...!

EdJogg 00:39, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The list mentioned has since been superseded by the Route Map. -- EdJogg 23:22, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Line today pictures.

It's a shame we don't have pictures of the line before 'today' under a free licence or in the public domain. I'm not sure whether it was right for me to put those images where I did. They don't seem to fit anyway, so I will probably remove them and maybe try to add them to the section on the line today at the bottom. JHJPDJKDKHI! 09:17, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see why you say they 'don't fit'. OK, so the section text has not been expanded fully yet (I've been working on non-Wiki projects recently!) but the pictures help illustrate it. Somewhere I have a picture of the outside of the tunnel, which I planned to include, but I haven't found it yet. EdJogg 08:43, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ed, there is this one on geograph. http://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/42683 JHJPDJKDKHI! 09:18, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hee hee - mine's better (two visible portals, no trees - if only I knew where it was...!) But thanks for pointing out 'geograph' - looks like somewhere else I'll have to start contributing... --- EdJogg 10:24, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Information required...

As the article is edited, you may become aware of information that is missing. Rather than just dump hidden comments in the text, it makes sense to gather appropriate questions here. Please strike-out, once answered in the text. Remember that we'll need references!

History

Does not mention 're-birth' as Tarka Trail. When did this take place?

Should mention return of rolling stock to the line, at 'Once Upon a Time'. We have a closure date (unref'd?), but when did it open? Ultimately, closure date should be for when the rolling stock was removed (assuming the station is going to be / has been redeveloped for housing) since the closure date for the attraction itself can be mentioned in the station section.

next

(EdJogg 23:22, 1 May 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Style

I am a bit uneasy about the phraseology in places; I hope no-one will be offended if I try to streamline it a bit.

Also "'Named' trains like the Atlantic Coast Express and the Devon Belle both started and terminated at Ilfracombe." What other 'named' trains did then? And "most certainly the fiercest climb" risks starting futile arguments; maybe a more descriptive explanation ... ? --Afterbrunel (talk) 11:38, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oooooo, it's probably my phraseology. This was one of my first new pages and is still supposedly at the head of my ToDo list for article developments... Most of my time is spent fixing other people's edits :o(

Re: 'Named trains...':

Is there actually a problem with this statement? The two trains mentioned are the famous ones, but I'm sure others may have run during the line's history, even if only in the run-up to closure.

Re: 'fiercest climb':

Maybe 'fiercest' is not wholly appropriate for an encyclopaedia, but it does (to me!) convey the effort required of engines and crews when setting off from Ilfracombe. I remember reading that it was something along the lines of "the steepest starting climb [in the UK] from a terminus on a two-track line", but I haven't yet found where I read it in order to provide a cite. (Bother!)

EdJogg (talk) 13:30, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Thornbury Branch Line which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 00:17, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Personal observations on site

There are rather a lot of statements that such-and-such is in use as something now. Personally I don't object too much to observational original research as long as it is moderate and not too improbable. But I do worry about a statement that "the former goods shed is now in use as J Bloggs & Co Ltd's workshop". This might have been true on the day someone went and looked (Mr Jogg in 2006, perhaps?) but might be untrue six months later when Bloggs & Co had a block of flats built there. And 16 years is a long time lapse. Afterbrunel (talk) 13:38, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]