Talk:Ignorance (song)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 20:22, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.

Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
Throughout the article, there's a lot of repetition of the song's name. It might be best to have a consistency with that. You know, it doesn't hurt to add "the song" or "the single" once in a while. In the Music video section, this sentence ---> "The video is intercuts with clips of the band performing in a cramped small room" doesn't make sense, mainly "The video is intercuts with clips". Do you mean "The video is intercutted with clips of the band performing in a cramped small room"?
Done Crystal Clear x3 04:39, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Done Crystal Clear x3 17:04, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Check.

B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
In the Personnel section, please link "co-producers" to its correspondence article, as at the moment it stands out as a disambiguation. Throughout the article, "...recorded in Spring 2009", with seasons differing in different part of the world, a different wording than spring should be picked, per here.
Done Crystal Clear x3 04:39, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Done Crystal Clear x3 17:04, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Check.
Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
~~Reference 7 has a different url link path, so you might want to update that.~~
Done Crystal Clear x3 04:39, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Check.

B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):

C. It contains no original research:

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
Not that much to do. If the statements above can be answered, I will pass the article. Good luck with improving this article!

-- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 20:22, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you to Crystal Clear for getting the stuff I left at the talk page, because I have gone off and placed the article as GA. Congrats. ;) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 18:11, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks : ) Crystal Clear x3 18:23, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]