Talk:Ignitron

	Electronics portal This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

It would be interesting for someone to give a description on how this device works?

I just added a bit more info on internal operation... Bert (talk) 13:43, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Additional information required

"It is usually a large steel container"

How large? I came here following a link on a page about vacuum tubes, so I have pretty small on my mind and cannot imagine compared to what is this "large". Please try to be more specific. --84.249.164.59 (talk) 09:48, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Couldn't find any dimensions on the web, but they are usually too big to lift - say, a half-metre or so high. http://www.epa.gov/region5/mercury/nwindianareport3-17-04.pdf page 19 shows a picture of a fellow standing next to some ignitrons of unspecified rating. --Wtshymanski (talk) 17:08, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

They aren't always this big, though - the common BK42, for example, is roughly 8" tall by 2.5" diameter, weighing 1.66kg.Emartuk (talk) 14:41, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

removed from article:

I've posted a correction once before. Please get an expert 'in' on this. The 'Ignitor' should be ABOVE the Mercury bath/dish to initiate a conductive plasma 'cloud'. Your diagram short-circuits 3 and 2 via 4 (conductive Mercury), which negates Insulating 5

A spark GAP is required between 3 and 4 for full conductive load to occur between 5 and 2.

Dr. James Douglas (removed from article by EdBever (talk) 07:56, 13 March 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Expert? We don't use experts here, just references. The reference I use says the ignitor probe is made of a refractory semiconductor like silicon carbide, and that the high electric field to initiate an arc develops in the meniscus between the probe tip and the surface of the mercury. Yes, I think that's a little odd, too, but please find a reference that shows a gap between the probe and the mercury surface and quote it here so we can all benefit from your expertise. The other refernce I have that talks about the inner workings of ignitrons doesn't say yes or no ona gap. --Wtshymanski (talk) 13:42, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've worked on characterizing and on the development of ignitrons for several years in the late eighties. The ignitor actually dips into the mercury, forming a meniscus having a dc resistance typically between 50 and 100 ohms. When the tube is triggered, an ionized mercury jet forms closing the gap between anode and cathode. Ignitrons often fail when metal from either the tube walls or the anode plates out on the ignitor, which allows it to be wetted with mercury. The ignitor resistance then falls under an ohm and the tube cannot be triggered.--RKihara (talk) 06:27, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

More moved text

These (unsigned) comments were added into the article, rather than the talk page as they should have been. Hellbus (talk) 02:42, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please Edit This Entry! 3 & 2 form a short-circuit via the mercury. For 'ignition' to occur, the 'ignitor' should be placed just above the mercury, otherwise, the ignitor HV would be in direct contact with the 'load voltage'. Once ionization occurs, a strong conductive path is generated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.27.150.190 (talk) 21:05, February 14, 2009

The drawing is correct. The Ignitor electrode is coated with a porous ceramic layer that isolates it from the mercury pool. The pores are small enough that the mercury's surface tension keeps it from touching the metal, and provide multiple sites for the ignition arcs.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.37.171.84 (talk) 12:20, June 23, 2009

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ignitron. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110815202923/http://etd.lib.ttu.edu/theses/available/etd-02262009-31295006979529/unrestricted/31295006979529.pdf to http://etd.lib.ttu.edu/theses/available/etd-02262009-31295006979529/unrestricted/31295006979529.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:10, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

information from russian wikipedia

russian wikipedia states that it was invented by russian earlier (about 1922) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.252.170.10 (talk) 09:29, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]