Talk:If You're Too Shy (Let Me Know)

If You're Too Shy (Let Me Know) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

If You're Too Shy (Let Me Know) is part of the Notes on a Conditional Form series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 21, 2021	Good article nominee	Listed
May 16, 2021	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Electronic music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:If You're Too Shy (Let Me Know)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 06:03, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

For all your contributions to the music GANs page, I will review this soon; I can seen that you are as reliable as clockwork for responses! --K. Peake 06:03, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you man! I appreciate it. I'm trying to get NOACF to good topic status. I just need to copyedit the remaining singles before overhauling the album itself. Looking forward to your input and experience. Cheers! (P.S. I apologize for the not-totally-proper use of British English. I’ve tried my best, but I’m used to writing in Canadian English; the strange hybrid lovechild of British and American English, lol.) Giacobbe ^talk 13:31, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

Recording date is not sourced, as the body only mentions the majority of the album's recording being in 2019

Done Giacobbe ^talk 13:20, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OVERLINK of the 1975 under songwriters

Done Giacobbe ^talk 13:20, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"by English band the 1975." → "by English band the 1975 from their fourth studio album, Notes on a Conditional Form (2020)." with the wikilink

Done Giacobbe ^talk 13:20, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"It was released on" → "The song was released on"

Done Giacobbe ^talk 13:20, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Target single to Single (music)

Done Giacobbe ^talk 13:20, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

End the sentence with "from the album." instead, as the title will be mentioned in the first sentence in the new order

Done Giacobbe ^talk 13:20, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"The song was written by" → "It was written by"

Done Giacobbe ^talk 13:20, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Ross MacDonald, and Matthew Healy." → "Ross MacDonald and Matthew Healy." since the article is in British English

Done Giacobbe ^talk 13:20, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Production of the track was" → "Production of the song was"

Done Giacobbe ^talk 13:20, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Target choruses to Refrain, but it is not mentioned anywhere in the body that Ross played the instruments for the choruses

Done Giacobbe ^talk 13:20, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Target bridge to Bridge (music)

Done Giacobbe ^talk 13:20, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"performing "If You're Too Shy (Let Me Know)" were" → "performing the song were"

Done Giacobbe ^talk 13:20, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"among fans of the band." → "among their fanbase."

Done Giacobbe ^talk 13:20, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Couldn't you trim down the instrumentation mentioned in the second para because it reads like a supermarket list; specifically remove flugelhorn, saxophone and trumpet since they've already been mentioned in the lead

A supermarket list hahaha Done Giacobbe ^talk 13:20, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Remove wikilink on guitar

Done Giacobbe ^talk 13:20, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Target synths to Synthesizer

Done Giacobbe ^talk 13:20, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"The track's maximalist production" → "The song's maximalist production"

Done Giacobbe ^talk 13:20, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"pop rock, and pop-punk" → "pop rock and pop-punk"

Done Giacobbe ^talk 13:20, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Lyrically, "If You’re Too Shy (Let Me Know)" details" → "Lyrically, the song details"

Done Giacobbe ^talk 13:20, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The part of the sentence that follows should be reworded since it is identically to the body so reads repetitively

Done Giacobbe ^talk 13:20, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"dependency, and despondency." → "dependency and despondency."

Done Giacobbe ^talk 13:20, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Duran Duran, and Bruce Springsteen," → "Duran Duran and Bruce Springsteen," since the later comma is still needed

Done Giacobbe ^talk 13:20, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Remove wikilink on Notes on a Conditional Form

Done Giacobbe ^talk 13:20, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"given to its production," → "given to the production,"

Done Giacobbe ^talk 13:20, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"The single attained international" → "It attained international"

Done Giacobbe ^talk 13:20, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"the top twenty in" → "the top 20 in" per MOS:NUM

Done Giacobbe ^talk 13:20, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"number 50 in Belgium, and" → "as well as number 50 in Belgium and" to avoid too many commas while still making sense

Done Giacobbe ^talk 13:20, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Domestically, "If You're Too Shy (Let Me Know)"" → "Domestically, the song"

Done Giacobbe ^talk 13:20, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"for the single was" → "for the song was"

Done Giacobbe ^talk 13:20, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"it featured black and white visuals of the band" → "the video features black and white visuals of the 1975"

Done Giacobbe ^talk 13:20, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Background and release

Img is a neat addition that brings back memories, looks good too!

Thanks, glad you liked it! Giacobbe ^talk 13:42, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"to their second studio album," → "to their second studio album"

Done Giacobbe ^talk 13:42, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"set to be released" → "with it being set for release"

Done Giacobbe ^talk 13:42, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"second album, Notes on a Conditional Form," → "second album Notes on a Conditional Form"

Done Giacobbe ^talk 13:42, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The source mentions the album being recorded in 2019, not the majority of it; however, this needs fixing from other source(s) since I can see from the album article that it was not fully recorded that year

Reworded and added a second ref. Done Giacobbe ^talk 15:02, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The title of the tour should not be in italics

Done Giacobbe ^talk 13:42, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"scheduling it for 21 February 2020 and later for 24 April 2020" the source mentions the months February and March of 2020, not the dates listed here

Added a more specific ref. Done Giacobbe ^talk 14:24, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"most exhaustive recording processes on" → "most exhaustive recording processes for"

Done Giacobbe ^talk 13:42, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"of The Durruti Column," → "of the Durruti Column," per MOS:CAPS

Done Giacobbe ^talk 13:42, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Target sample to Sampling (music)

Done Giacobbe ^talk 13:42, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Target chorus to Refrain

Done Giacobbe ^talk 13:42, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"to write the verses." → "to write a verse."

Done Giacobbe ^talk 13:42, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Target operatic to Opera#Operatic voices

Done Giacobbe ^talk 13:42, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"which he said," → "which he said"

Done Giacobbe ^talk 13:42, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why is the PF ref invoked solely at the end of the para when it is used for multiple sentences prior? This would be acceptable if the entirety of the para was backed up by the source, but it is not; try invoking around every two sentences or so as a guideline.

I'm afraid a little confused. This was the way I normally write articles. However, in my last GA review, the reviewer wanted to me to reformat and only cite at the last use of the ref in the paragraph. He pointed me to WP:RECITE, which I couldn't find any info on. So now I'm a little confused. Should I be citing whenever the source is used, or only at its last use in a paragraph? Giacobbe ^talk 14:18, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(CA)Giacobbe You do have a valid point and after having read WP:REPCITE, I believe that you should only invoke ref 9 in two areas: the one it is already in and at the end of the "created the final version" sentence. This is because it is used to back up all of the sentences to the latter point, but the sentence in-between that one and the end one is solely attributed to ref 8, so you can have the last sentence also invoke ref 9 comfortably. --K. Peake 14:28, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Giacobbe ^talk 16:25, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Remove wikilink on England

Done Giacobbe ^talk 13:42, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Remove wikilink on Music For Cars Tour

Done Giacobbe ^talk 13:42, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"in the UK." → "in the United Kingdom."

Done Giacobbe ^talk 13:42, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"called it the best song" → "called it the most promising song" since not only is this what the source says, but it is most appropriate for context of a performance

Done Giacobbe ^talk 13:42, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Target single to Single (music)

Done Giacobbe ^talk 13:42, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

""Drop 'Too Shy'"" → ""Drop 'Too Shy""

Done Giacobbe ^talk 13:42, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikilink Twitter

Done Giacobbe ^talk 13:42, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is written that the song was released alongside a radio edit, but the source only links to the radio edit; either reword or add another source

Done Giacobbe ^talk 16:25, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"up about [it]."" → "up about [it]"." per MOS:QUOTE

Done Giacobbe ^talk 13:42, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Composition

Retitle to Composition and lyrics

Done Giacobbe ^talk 15:13, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"of "If You're Too Shy (Let Me Know)" showcasing" → "of "If You're Too Shy (Let Me Know)", showcasing" on the audio sample text

Done Giacobbe ^talk 15:13, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"of five minutes and nineteen seconds." → "of five minutes and 19 seconds (5:19)." per MOS:NUM

Done Giacobbe ^talk 15:13, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The funk and techno elements are not sourced, unless they are from the Financial Times ref that I can't view due to not having a subscription

Was using WP:RECITE. I've recited it here, as per our discussion above. Done Giacobbe ^talk 15:13, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(CA)Giacobbe I gave a wikilink to the WP guideline properly above and this looks a lot better, identifying the elements as techno-funk! --K. Peake 15:33, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I had trouble finding it before. BTW, if you ever come across an article by the Financial Times blocked behind a paywall, simply Tweet the link and open it from there. It will let you read it through the app :) Giacobbe ^talk 16:17, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"is set in common time" → "is set in the time signature of common time" with the wikilink

Done Giacobbe ^talk 15:13, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikilink chord progression

Done Giacobbe ^talk 15:13, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Target pre-choruses to Pre-chorus per MOS:LINK2SECT

Done Giacobbe ^talk 15:13, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Remove wikilink on guitar

Done Giacobbe ^talk 15:13, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Remove target on samples

Done Giacobbe ^talk 15:13, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"deep grooves, and" → "deep grooves and" with the target

Done Giacobbe ^talk 15:13, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"dependency, and despondency." → "dependency and despondency."

Done Giacobbe ^talk 15:13, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Target ambient to Ambient music and new-age to New-age music on the img text

Done Giacobbe ^talk 15:13, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The intro length, "ghostly" description, drones, reverb, and glitch elements are not sourced by the two refs at the end of the sentence or the following one

Done Giacobbe ^talk 16:17, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The ethereal and wordless parts do not appear to be backed up

Done Giacobbe ^talk 16:17, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"with Healy singing:" the lyrics that follow are not written out by the source

Done Giacobbe ^talk 16:17, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"anticipation "almost palpable."" → "anticipation "almost palpable"."

Done Giacobbe ^talk 16:17, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"I need to get back," the lyrics are not mentioned by sources as being the pre-chorus

Done Giacobbe ^talk 16:17, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Maybe I would like you better if you took off your clothes / I wanna see and stop thinking / If you're too shy then let me know"" needs small speech marks around this part of the quote

Done Giacobbe ^talk 16:17, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[28][25][34] should be put in numerical order

Done Giacobbe ^talk 16:17, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Target bridge to Bridge (music)

Done Giacobbe ^talk 16:17, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You should here that the saxophone is alto and tenor, as is written in the lead and the source can be found from credits and personnel

Done Giacobbe ^talk 16:17, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Remove release year for A Brief Inquiry into Online Relationships

Done Giacobbe ^talk 16:17, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"to Bruce Springsteen, and" → "to Bruce Springsteen and"

Done Giacobbe ^talk 16:17, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"over video chat."" → "over video chat"."

Done Giacobbe ^talk 16:17, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Critical reception

Img looks good!

Thanks! Giacobbe ^talk 16:37, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"favourably comparing it to" → "favourably comparing the song to"

Done Giacobbe ^talk 16:37, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Duran Duran, and The Cure." → "Duran Duran and the Cure." per MOS:CAPS

Done Giacobbe ^talk 16:37, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Remove or replace The Edge per WP:RSSM

Done Giacobbe ^talk 16:37, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"called the single" → "called the song"

Done Giacobbe ^talk 16:37, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"without it tiring."" → "without it tiring"."

Done Giacobbe ^talk 16:37, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Remove or replace RedBrick per WP:RSSM

Done Giacobbe ^talk 16:37, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"and metaphorically compared it" → "and metaphorically compared the song"

Done Giacobbe ^talk 16:37, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikilink [[lightning rod]

Done Giacobbe ^talk 16:37, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"from the heavens."" → "from the heavens"."

Done Giacobbe ^talk 16:37, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"they wish to."" → "they wish to"."

Done Giacobbe ^talk 16:37, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"the single was emblematic" → "the song is emblematic"

Done Giacobbe ^talk 16:37, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"micro-genre", and" → "micro-genre" and"

Done Giacobbe ^talk 16:37, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Ross Horton of MusicOMH said the song was" → "Ross Horton of musicOMH said the song is"

Done Giacobbe ^talk 16:37, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"calling it "the record's" → "calling the song "the record's"

Done Giacobbe ^talk 16:37, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"charmingly sleazy hook."" → "charmingly sleazy hook"."

Done Giacobbe ^talk 16:37, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"wrote it was:" → "wrote it is:"

Done Giacobbe ^talk 16:37, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"In a favourable review," → "In another favourable review," because otherwise, it sounds like this is coming after mixed/negative ones

Done Giacobbe ^talk 16:37, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"was the only track" → "is the only track"

Done Giacobbe ^talk 16:37, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"of The 1975 (2013)," → "of the 1975's eponymous debut studio album (2013),"

Done Giacobbe ^talk 16:37, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"commenting that it placed" → "commenting that the song places"

Done Giacobbe ^talk 16:37, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"of a John Hughes film." → "of a Hughes film."

Done Giacobbe ^talk 16:37, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Img looks good!

Thanks! Giacobbe ^talk 16:37, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"remarked that it:" → "remarked that the song"

Done Giacobbe ^talk 16:37, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The release years added in brackets aren't included in the quoted text; either add with [] or alter prose to take the songs and artists out of the quote

Done Giacobbe ^talk 16:37, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Blue Nile → the Blue Nile

Done Giacobbe ^talk 16:37, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[combined] → [combines]

Done Giacobbe ^talk 16:37, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"radio-friendly hooks."" → "radio-friendly hooks"."

Done Giacobbe ^talk 16:37, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"called it" → "called the track"

Done Giacobbe ^talk 16:37, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Simple Minds never wrote."" → "Simple Minds never wrote"."

Done Giacobbe ^talk 16:37, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Remove release year of "Everybody Wants to Rule the World"

Done Giacobbe ^talk 16:37, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"erotic Zoom call."" → "erotic Zoom call"."

Done Giacobbe ^talk 16:37, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"saxophones, and "saucy"" → "saxophones and "saucy""

Done Giacobbe ^talk 16:37, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"the insatiable jam."" → "the insatiable jam"."

Done Giacobbe ^talk 16:37, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"of Tears For Fear" → "of Tears For Fears"

Done Giacobbe ^talk 16:37, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"that it represented the band" → "that it represents the band"

Done Giacobbe ^talk 16:37, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"The Cure, and the music of John Hughes" → "the Cure and the music of Hughes"

Done Giacobbe ^talk 16:37, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Year-end lists

See MOS:TABLECAPTION

Done Giacobbe ^talk 16:55, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't you mention the names of the lists; see "Clique" for example? Especially since a number of these are unranked.

Done Giacobbe ^talk 16:55, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edwin Ortiz (Complex) → Edwin Ortiz (Complex) with the target per MOS:LINK2SECT

Done Giacobbe ^talk 16:55, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Music video

Wikilink music video

Done Giacobbe ^talk 17:00, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Remove target on directed

Done Giacobbe ^talk 17:00, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Remove target on producer

Done Giacobbe ^talk 17:00, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Remove target on edited

Done Giacobbe ^talk 17:00, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[60] should be at the end of the "Visually simplistic," sentence, as it is only invoked once currently in this para

Done Giacobbe ^talk 17:00, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"It is shot in" → "The video is shot in"

Done Giacobbe ^talk 17:00, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"yet effective approach."" → "yet effective approach"."

Done Giacobbe ^talk 17:00, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commercial performance

Create this section because not only did the song chart in numerous countries, but you have written about this in the lead

Done Giacobbe ^talk 17:58, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Credits and personnel

Use {{spaced ndash}} so there is the right space between credits and personnel

Done Giacobbe ^talk 18:05, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Composers should be first, followed by producer, followed by backing vocalist, then instrumental contributors and end with mixer

Done Giacobbe ^talk 18:05, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Charts

Use col to separate weekly and year-end charts

Done Giacobbe ^talk 17:58, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly charts

See MOS:TABLECAPTION

Done Giacobbe ^talk 17:58, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Year-end charts

See MOS:TABLECAPTION

Done Giacobbe ^talk 17:58, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

Copyvio score looks too high at 59.2%; try to fix this by cutting down on the quoting from the Atwood Magazine ref, but the instances where it is merely the title being flagged under copyvio should be ignored

Took a look at this and it isn't from the quote, lol. I didn't realize, but Atwood has all the lyrics displayed in the article. Giacobbe ^talk 18:08, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(CA)Giacobbe Are you sure you don't need to reduce the lyrics quoting from the Billboard ref? --K. Peake 18:36, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, pretty much had to remove the entire intro line to get the score to 44%. Nonetheless it's Done Giacobbe ^talk 19:06, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Make sure all of these are archived by using the tool

Silly question but how do I go about this? Giacobbe ^talk 18:08, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(CA)Giacobbe View the revision history and click on fix dead links. --K. Peake 18:36, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Target Pitchfork to Pitchfork (magazine) on ref 9

Done Giacobbe ^talk 18:15, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Remove or replace refs 13 and 18 per WP:RSSM

Done Giacobbe ^talk 18:15, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Remove the author from ref 23, as staff shouldn't be cited in that parameter

Done Giacobbe ^talk 18:15, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fix MOS:QWQ issues with refs 25, 30, 36, 37 AND 60

Done Giacobbe ^talk 18:31, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Remove target on Pitchfork for ref 34

Done Giacobbe ^talk 18:15, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MusicOMH → musicOMH on ref 43

Done Giacobbe ^talk 18:15, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cite Complex as website instead for ref 57 and target to Complex (magazine) per MOS:LINK2SECT

Done Giacobbe ^talk 18:15, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

External links

Good

Final comments and verdict

On hold until all of the issues are fixed, but the most noticeable one throughout was American English being used even though English is the performer's nationality. --K. Peake 14:21, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Kyle Peake: I believe I've addressed all of your concerns and made the necessary changes. Thank you for taking the time to review this article for me, I genuinely appreciate it. You rock. Cheers! Giacobbe ^talk 18:34, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(CA)Giacobbe It is amazing to hear you are so satisfied with this review, but you still need to address the comments I made regarding the references and edit out mentions of the song's title where I said to in the lead. --K. Peake 18:40, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Kyle Peake: Sorry, must have missed those two in the lead. Copyvio score now at 44%. I can't archive the references, it gives me an error message: "Analysis error: blocked: You have been blocked from editing". Giacobbe ^talk 19:09, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@(CA)Giacobbe: That has happened to me before, it is not a user specific thing; the issue only arises when the tool is not working temporarily. ✓ Pass nevertheless, as the sources can be archived days from now hopefully or however long it takes for the tool to fix! --K. Peake 19:19, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Kyle Peake: Ahh okay. No worries, I'll try again later tonight. Fingers crossed. Thank you for your (very) speedy review. Top notch work. Cheers! Giacobbe ^talk 19:23, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@(CA)Giacobbe: Yeah you try that, if not successful then give it a few days before another attempt. Also, I would like to issue a big thanks to you for working as well as clockwork in your response!!! --K. Peake 19:25, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]