Talk:Idrialite
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
No consistency
[edit]The first formula given has no sulphur in it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.194.42.37 (talk) 14:43, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
- See the cited references. A single study, a primary source, does not replace existing references. The Raman study abstract says that thiophenic ring are "usually present" in the samples. I lack access to the article, does it redefine the formula and has it been verified elsewhere and accepted as a "new" formula? Vsmith (talk) 14:58, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class Geology articles
- Low-importance Geology articles
- Low-importance Stub-Class Geology articles
- WikiProject Geology articles
- Stub-Class Rocks and minerals articles
- Low-importance Rocks and minerals articles
- Low-importance Stub-Class Rocks and minerals articles
- WikiProject Rocks and minerals articles