Talk:Ico/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
This looks like a very good article. You do a good job of orienting the reader who is not a game player (me). I will make some comments now and make more later if I see the need. I don't see any major problems. —Mattisse (Talk) 03:42, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

• All titles in the footnotes should be sentence capitalization. No all capes.
• There are some prose issue (issues in wording). I can either try to fix them myself or list them here, or a combination, whatever you prefer. Let me know what you want.

That's all I see for now (but I am tired!)

Save for the "ICO"/"NICO" titles, I fixed the other all-caps sections. Feel free to review the text yourself, any copyedit help is appreciated. --MASEM 15:24, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

• I am not sure what this sentence means: "These actions are complicated by the fact that only Ico is able to do these steps" - What steps? —Mattisse (Talk) 22:30, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Changed to "perform these actions". --MASEM 00:08, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
• I did a little copy editing, hopefully OK. Other than the sentence above, which is not a big deal, everything looks great. —Mattisse (Talk) 23:02, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Final GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): Very clearly written, so a non-game player like me can understand it. b (MoS): No apparent MoS violations

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): Well referenced b (citations to reliable sources): Sources are reliable c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): Sets the context b (focused): Remains focused on article subject

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias: Neutral

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Excellent job! —Mattisse (Talk) 00:34, 15 November 2008 (UTC)