Talk:Ice Cream Cake (EP)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ice Cream Cake (EP) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Korea Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Korean popular culture working group.

Proposed merge with Ice Cream Cake (song)

I think it would be better if these articles were merged. Almost everything in the song article is already in the album article, and what isn't can easily be included there. I doubt there is enough in-depth coverage to justify having two separate articles. It would be different if there was a lot of coverage and lots of reviews of both the song and album from reliable sources. There shouldn't be this much overlap between two articles, and I also think it would read better if all the information was in one article. Random86 (talk) 06:56, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

<New Idea> I think it would be better if the two articles will be separated. This is because Ice Cream Cake is a song while Ice Cream Cake (album) is a mini-album, thus having two different ideas. The article for the song will also show the important facts (ex: song producers, song makers). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.60.156.177 (talk) 01:33, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is really no point in having 2 almost-identical articles. If there is enough in-depth information, there would not be an objection to separate them; but the majority of Kpop albums/songs never get that kind of in-depth coverage. Most of the published information is only for "PR-ed" purposes.--TerryAlex (talk) 02:51, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with TerryAlex, there is nothing substantially different between the articles Asdklf; (talk) 03:11, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I also support merging, as there is no evidence this song is one of the few that merits a standalone article per WP:SONGS. As already pointed-out, the song and album articles are nearly identical. Shinyang-i (talk) 06:31, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In addition to the merge, the title of the article is problematic, as it should be Ice Cream Cake (EP), as it is incredibly confusing between the Ice cream cake article and it can't just be differentiated by capital letters. Azuxingmi^talk 21:56, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So should we go ahead and perform the merge? Asdklf; (talk) 20:09, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I think there is consensus to merge. I can do it later today but feel free to do it now. Random86 (talk) 21:26, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No you go ahead, I always forget at least one step Asdklf; (talk) 22:38, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

People capitalize desserts and recipes

This needs (EP), otherwise it fails recognizability. In ictu oculi (talk) 15:20, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ice Cream Cake (EP). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160910145520/http://gaonchart.co.kr/main/section/chart/album.gaon?nationGbn=T&serviceGbn=&targetTime=2015&hitYear=2015&termGbn=year to http://gaonchart.co.kr/main/section/chart/album.gaon?nationGbn=T&serviceGbn=&targetTime=2015&hitYear=2015&termGbn=year

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:21, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]