This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Thanks to recent vandalism, article now has a strong bias in favor of Ibaneis Rocha and his political positions after updates on 9 January 2023. Recent updates about Ibaneis Rocha's suspension suggest partisan bias and misinformat. The author's definition of socialism and its effects are delivered as facts when they are actually fringe interpretations by the political far left. Wikipedia is supposed to be neutral and nonpartisan. Author is very likely a supporter of the protesters who stormed the government buildings in 9 January 2023 and is using the Wikipedia page to promote that ideology. 207.237.106.44 (talk) 09:04, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
As this page is related to a recent political event, I believe it should be given page protection. I’m relatively inexperienced at Wikipedia custodianship however, so I’m asking here. SufficientChipmunk3 (talk) 21:54, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
