This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science articles
David Eppstein, please re-read WP:SDDATES. You quoted part of a sentence and ignored the rest that says "or enhance it as a descriptive annotation". Adding dates clearly enhances the annotation and your other edit summary "we don't and shouldn't put dates in shortdescs" is utterly false. A consensus on this was reached at SD project which led to the guidance at Wikipedia:Short description. Sorry if you don't agree with it but that is the consensus. MB23:33, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The original discussion of the language in SDDATES was at Wikipedia talk:Short description/Archive 8#Dates in short description. It is clear from that discussion that many participants were against adding dates to short descriptions as a general rule, but found them acceptable as a way of disambiguating articles when disambiguation is needed. Therefore, the specific language that was added to SDDATES specified that they should be used in cases where disambiguation is needed and where a date is a helpful way of disambiguating, and that for biographies in particular dates can be a helpful way of disambiguating. You, on the other hand, appear to be adding the date to a short description as a general rule, disregarding the question of whether they are needed as disambiguation. There is obviously no need for disambiguation in searches for which this article is a result, because the article title already has a better disambiguator (his profession) and because there are no other computer scientists with this name to disambiguate. I conclude that you are misreading SDDATES and misapplying the results of the consensus there. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:48, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
