Jump to content

Talk:Ian Gilmour, Baron Gilmour of Craigmillar

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1962 by-elections

[edit]

I have just removed from the article the following sentence:

"Gilmour contested the Hounslow West by-election, 1962"

I can find no such by-election listed in the List of United Kingdom by-elections (1950 - 1979), or on the British Parliamentary by-elections site (the latter sit lists all candidates at all by-elections, and the only Gilmour listed for 1962 is in the Central Norfolk by-election).

I can't find any constituency called Hounslow, or any other by-election in a constituency with a similar-sounding name, so I have asumed that this entry was some sort of mistake. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:45, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hounslow Wesr is definitely there! Its in Middlesex, and was for many years the London underground stop for Heathrow Airport.David Lauder 20:47, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
He was always referred to as Sir Ian Gilmour, Bt. David Lauder 20:48, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Baron is of course higher than the baronetcy but he remains a baronet in addition to the Life Peerage. The Baronetcy is not replaced, so technically you are wrong, regardless of some rule peculiar to Wikipedia. David Lauder 10:25, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relation of Sir John Gilmour?

[edit]

Are the two related? john k 01:20, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Heir

[edit]

Not that it makes much difference, since it will presumably be changed now that Lord Gilmour has died, but how come his eldest son is his "heir presumptive"? Normally an eldest son is heir apparent: primogeniture and all that Onebyone 20:11, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I imagine that's just someone making a mistake. --Counter-revolutionary 20:14, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ian Gilmour, Baron Gilmour of Craigmillar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:50, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ian Gilmour, Baron Gilmour of Craigmillar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:40, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]