Talk:Ian Gibbons (biochemist)
Ian Gibbons (biochemist) was nominated as a Natural sciences good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (April 27, 2023). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ian Gibbons (biochemist) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Date convention for the article
[edit]As the subject of the article was British, suggest we use UK date convention of Day Month Year. I'm not hugely invested in it either way, but just wanted to give others opportunity for feedback here. Thank you, Princessa Unicorn (talk) 18:22, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
I have added the template for NPOV at the top of the article as it is heavily weighted towards the view of Gibbons and against Theranos and Holmes. Aqeccac (talk) 12:05, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
- Disagree with and object to the ugly tag at the top of the article. User also removed sources without explanation as to why, in edit [1]. Theranos is gone. Therefore, Theranos has no point of view of its own. Holmes was convicted of fraud. The user gives zero explanation as to why they feel there is bias according to their point of view. Princessa Unicorn (talk) 19:22, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
- Aqeccac, after a careful look at the article I agree with Princessa Unicorn that the article has a neutral point of view. However, I'm concerned about a possible conflict of interest with Rochelle Gibbons. Miniapolis 01:31, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for your feedback, it's most appreciated. To my knowledge, none of the recent editors to this article have any conflict of interest. All of your input has been most helpful, thank you! Princessa Unicorn (talk) 13:14, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
- Aqeccac, after a careful look at the article I agree with Princessa Unicorn that the article has a neutral point of view. However, I'm concerned about a possible conflict of interest with Rochelle Gibbons. Miniapolis 01:31, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Ian Gibbons (biochemist)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs) 17:18, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
I'll review this. Princessa Unicorn, before I start, I see you haven't edited in a month -- can you just confirm you'll be available to respond to any review comments? Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 17:18, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
- No response, so I'm failing this. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 16:17, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
- Former good article nominees
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- Wikipedia requested photographs of scientists and academics
- Wikipedia requested photographs of people
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class United Kingdom articles
- Low-importance United Kingdom articles
- WikiProject United Kingdom articles
- Start-Class University of Cambridge articles