Talk:Ian Cook (artist)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

References

Linkedin is not okay to use in any circumstances. "a person generally knows about themselves" - that's right, but you shouldn't be using them as a reference. cook is a primary source, which is not okay to use.

you're contradicting yourself too. "that is probably ian correcting the facts". since "a person generally knows about themselves", why not let it stay? please this is not difficult; its basic. linkedin definitely no — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yifek (talk • contribs) 20:41, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I get your point on LinkedIn and how Ian is a primary source and all that, but there are plenty of reliable sources from newspapers etc; why did you delete those? Newspapers aren't gossip (usually).

I am not contradicting myself. I reverted back to Ian's corrections after somebody else had reverted it. Look in the history properly. As a person generally knows about themselves, it can stay. So neither of us need now to edit the article on this matter. Rcsprinter (talk) 06:27, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Ian Cook (artist). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120220133526/http://www.rallybuzz.com/popbang-colour-heritage-motor-centre/ to http://www.rallybuzz.com/popbang-colour-heritage-motor-centre/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:20, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]