Jump to content

Talk:I Still See Your Face

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeI Still See Your Face was a Music good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 31, 2020Guild of Copy EditorsCopyedited
October 31, 2020Peer reviewReviewed
November 6, 2020Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Former good article nominee

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:I Still See Your Face/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 18:44, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Short article that won't take too long; will start reviewing today or tomorrow. --K. Peake 18:44, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quick fail

[edit]

Sorry I have to do this, I was going to go through in full when I initially noticed the issues because I thought they would be minor; however, this article is way too far from being broad in its coverage. There is a lack of sources to indicate this, with many coming from YouTube and Twitter alongside unreliable ones such as Highclouds.org and Spotify. On top of this, the lead is poorly written with info being crammed together like in the last sentence and things are not organised well in the body that also shows a lack of broadness with only two sections of prose.  Fail time now. --K. Peake 09:41, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]