Talk:I Predict a Riot

Anyone else think the 'I Predict a Riot' bit sounds like 'I've got tourettes'? Just me then *nods*

Well, please sign your posts, and this isn't a discussion forum, BUT I will tell you that I agree. T (Formerly Known as FireSpike) 01:51, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Who wrote the song?

Seems odd that there can be so much content without mentioning the songwriter. --Richard Gadsden 22:57, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'dve thought it was pretty self explanitory that it was Kaiser Chiefs.

Why do i think i heard this song years ago, is everyone sure it isnt a cover?--nedk

It definately isn't a cover 81.157.223.236 (talk) 18:11, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Took offence?

The interview [1] simply says that one band member thought it was "embarrassing" that they changed the lyrics, for reasons which they don't go into. It's reading too much into that to say they "took offence". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.123.226.227 (talk) 10:55, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:IpredictariotCD1b.jpg

Image:IpredictariotCD1b.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:33, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:IpredictariotCD2.png

Image:IpredictariotCD2.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:34, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Powers of prediction?

Can this song be both a portrayal of a rowdy night out in Leeds and a correct prediction of riots in England in August 2011. Was girls scrabbling around with with no clothes on a big feature of the 2011 riots? What's the relevance of chip fat? What makes the song a prediction of these riots and not, for example, of the Glasgow Rangers fans riot in Manchester in 2008? I think we need something more verifiable than a report of a throw-away line in a radio interview after the event... 80.176.88.21 (talk) 20:26, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on I Predict a Riot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090403012418/http://whitey.cf.huffingtonpost.com:80/ to http://whitey.cf.huffingtonpost.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:12, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]