Jump to content

Talk:I Pity the Poor Immigrant

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Evrik (talk20:55, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Created by BennyOnTheLoose (talk). Self-nominated at 08:44, 21 July 2022 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited: Yes - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
  • Interesting: Yes
QPQ: Done.
Overall: Article is long enough, new and well sourced. (Nice job @BennyOnTheLoose:!). Earwig is freaking out but all the quotations used are properly attributed. AGF on ALT2 because I wasn't able to access that source, but I personally prefer ALT0 and ALT1 anyway. BuySomeApples (talk) 03:36, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Girl of the North Country

[edit]

Wonder if I pity the poor immigrant was part of that musical? 114.72.47.174 (talk) 03:26, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:I Pity the Poor Immigrant/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ippantekina (talk · contribs) 01:17, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Will review this within a week. Ippantekina (talk) 01:17, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Putting this  On hold for seven days. Ippantekina (talk) 15:16, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for the review, Ippantekina. I've replied above. Let me know if anything else is needed. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 09:03, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@BennyOnTheLoose: I have one minor concern regarding the word "used" as above. Bjorner as a source appears fine. I looked into the discussion regarding Searching for a Gem and it also appears fine, at least for a GA. Ippantekina (talk) 09:24, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ippantekina:. Thank you. I've made a further change as noted above. Let me know if more is needed. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 09:52, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Passing. Great work! Ippantekina (talk) 09:55, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]