Talk:I Have Questions/GA2
Appearance
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Aoba47 (talk · contribs) 04:41, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
- Grabbing for a review. Aoba47 (talk) 04:41, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
- Lead and infobox
- I would paraphrase the "first chapter” quote.
- For this part (On its release, the song achieved minimal success on charts in Spain, Portugal and France.), I would change “achieved minimal success on charts in” to “charted in” as “minimal success” is more subjective.
Done
- Background and release
- I think that an image of Cabello or Fifth Harmony would be helpful here.
- I disagree, I don't see any real benefit of including a picture in this section, as it already has a quote. I personally think that a picture would make it seems a little bit scattered. –UrbanJE (talk) 12:55, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
- Please include a short descriptive phrase in front of Cabello.
- Please spell out the term EP (i.e. extended play) and link it.
- I am not certain about this part (and a considerable number of singles). I would remove it as the phrase Is rather subjective, specifically the word “considerable”, and reads like a fan wrote it.
- Please include the year in which 7/27 was released.
- Composition and lyrics
- For this part (While many have thought the song), specify what you mean for “many”.
- For this part (Singing the second verse, the singer wonders), I would use “Cabello” instead of “singer” to avoid repetition.
- The song “Everytime” should be in quotations.
- For this sentence (Rolling Stone's Althea Legaspi wrote she sings with "raw emotion”.), specify that “she” means “Cabello”.
Done
- Reception
- I would separate the critical reception and the commercial performance into two separate paragraphs.
- Yeah, I thought about it but this section is very short, if I separate in two, these subsections would have less than five lines each other so, is better separate in two paragraphs. -UrbanJE (talk) 13:00, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
- References
- For Reference 4, the word “exclusive” should not be in all caps.
Done
- Final comments
- Wonderful work with this article. Once my comments are addressed, I will pass this. Aoba47 (talk) 06:15, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
- I have done everything. Thank you again. :) -UrbanJE (talk) 13:00, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
- Verdict
- Thank you for addressing everything. I will ✓ Pass this. Aoba47 (talk) 16:22, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.