Talk:I Hadn't Meant to Tell You This

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 8 January 2020 and 21 April 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Omega789. Peer reviewers: Ladybug25861.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:46, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

1) First, what does the article do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Any turn of phrase that described the subject in a clear way? Your themes section is the best part of your article- I love that you provided examples and explained the themes you suggested.

2) What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? Why would those changes be an improvement?

I think you should add Marie’s father to your character list because his character provides the audience with an idea of how the town views white people. I really like your synopsis, but I think you can get rid of the first sentence because I’m not sure it does much for the understanding of this novel.

3) What’s the most important thing the author could do to improve the article?

I think adding another section of “awards” would benefit the article and, I would link more other Wikipedia articles to provide more background. For example, not many people know what Kurkus is, so I think you could link to the Wiki article on that.

4) Are there any details from your assessment of each category above that you would like to point out to the author?

You did a great job at remaining neutral; I truly don’t know if you liked this book or not. Additionally, I think your themes section would be better organized if you broke it into bullet points because I feel it would be easier to follow that way.

5) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? Let them know!

Providing examples for the themes you identified is something I will investigate regarding my own article. Overall, great job!

(Ladybug25861 (talk) 16:39, 11 April 2020 (UTC))[reply]