Talk:I Don't Like the Drugs (But the Drugs Like Me)/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Homeostasis07 (talk · contribs) 22:03, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be reviewing this over the next few hours. Homeostasis07 (talk) 22:03, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may have seen me editing over the past few hours. There were a couple of typos, a couple of things that I've rephrased, and I've re-titled a sub-section. Also, the personnel section needed some alphabetizing, and there were a few international charts missing from the charts sub-section. I find it quicker to be bold and do these things myself, rather than post a big list here of tiny little things that need doing. This is clearly a well-written article, with verifiable statements sourced to reliable sources. Happy to promote it.

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:

Congratulations, once again, Magic. Homeostasis07 (talk) 01:39, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.