Talk:I Could Be the One

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Electronic music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fuck School

Does anyone have any information about the fact that this song appears to have existed with different vocals as "Avicii feat. Nicky Romero - Fuck School" in February 2012? Catphish (talk) 22:46, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Information about the 2 versions of the track can be found here: http://freshnewtracks.com/2012/12/29/avicii-nicky-romero/ Catphish (talk) 22:50, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Music Video Mix?

The music video of "I Could Be the One" is a different mix than any that have been commercially released so far. Does anyone know if this release will be made available soon or if it has already been released? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.91.235.100 (talk) 22:50, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 07:03, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This song has been a massive hit all over the world, the other song barely made the top 40 in Ireland and the UK. Unreal7 (talk) 19:44, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per WP:SONGDAB. Where there are two or more songs with the same name it correct and proper to disambiguate by the artists name. I daresay there are many other songs with the same title mentioned in WP, too. --Richhoncho (talk) 12:08, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per WP:SONGDAB. Also 3rd song as redirect I Could Be the One (Marti Webb song). In ictu oculi (talk) 16:02, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: (edit conflict, written before IIO confirmed what I suspected) This song is a very WP:RECENT release, and the article doesn't describe anything that would point to this song as having any special enduring significance, so it is not clear whether it will have any special status in terms of long-term notability. If someone looks around a little bit, I suspect we would already find other topics that are covered on Wikipedia that should also be included on the dab page. I generally believe that the names of artists should be included in the titles of articles about their songs and albums. That makes the titles more clear and recognizable, and avoids future maintenance headaches over whether to consider some particular song or album as primary. New releases often appear with the same names, and the popularity of music is volatile. WP:NCM supports this view. —BarrelProof (talk) 16:12, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per WP:SONGDAB and ditto. --Vivaelcelta {talk · contributions} 10:28, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified one external link on I Could Be the One (Avicii and Nicky Romero song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6MRmHf8xS to http://www.aria.com.au/pages/aria-charts-end-of-year-charts-top-100-singles-2013.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}). This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:11, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified 3 external links on I Could Be the One (Avicii and Nicky Romero song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.aria.com.au/pages/aria-charts-end-of-year-charts-top-100-singles-2013.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140715102748/http://media.wix.com/ugd/ff1e07_13cc06642b654b95979ea5d7fb76d27a.pdf to http://media.wix.com/ugd/ff1e07_13cc06642b654b95979ea5d7fb76d27a.pdf
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.allaccess.com/top40-mainstream/future-releases

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:24, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 24 July 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: pages moved as requested per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 19:35, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

– More than 5 years after its release (and prior to Avicii's death), target article was still crystal clear.[1] Unreal7 (talk) 22:21, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose no primary in long term significance here. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:40, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. 93% of pageviews is pretty darn compelling. Dohn joe (talk) 16:16, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per In ictu oculi. Insufficiently notable to overwhelm the other two titles at the disambiguation page. Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 05:56, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It was a top-ten single in eleven countries, including number one in the U.K..... Dohn joe (talk) 14:21, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It would seem, however, that the same arguments which prevented this nomination from succeeding five years ago [Requested move, 11 October 2013, above] have not changed. Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 18:34, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The previous RM was from when the song had been released less than a year, thus the WP:RECENT arguments then. We now have an additional five years of experience to see that this article remains vastly more viewed than the others. 120 views/day is nothing to sneeze at, and shows the relatively greater enduring notability over the other article. Dohn joe (talk) 18:41, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Pageviews and chart positions show that the Acicii and Nicky Romero song is clearly the primary topic. — Newslinger talk 04:12, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Primary topic in what's essentially a WP:TWODABS situation.--Cúchullain ^t/c 19:50, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support. This is the primary topic. The only other entry with an article of this title may not even pass the notability criteria for songs. The editor whose username is Z0 18:14, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.