Jump to content

Talk:I Ching/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: 3family6 (talk · contribs) 20:18, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
    No copyvios, well-written, polished prose.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 15:57, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
    Layout and writing follows MOS.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 15:57, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:
    Well-formatted reference section.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 15:57, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    B. Citations to reliable sources, where necessary:
    Cited to reliable sources.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 15:57, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    C. No original research:
    All content is attributable to reliable sources.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 15:57, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    Covers major aspects, not overly-detailed.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 15:57, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    B. Focused:
    Focused on subject, no extraneous detail.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 15:57, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
    Neutral presentation, no bias.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 15:57, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
    Stable, at least for the past several months.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 15:57, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    All images are public domain or have similar free licensing.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 15:57, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
    Images are relevant, with suitable captions.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 15:57, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Overall: High quality article, should be ready for Featured Article review.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 15:57, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    Pass or Fail: