Jump to content

Talk:I (A.R. Kane album)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved to i (A.R. Kane album), allmusic only source using quote marks. Cf. i (Misako Odani album), also italicised. (non-admin closure) walk victor falk talk 09:44, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]




"i"Open to any suggestions – See I (disambiguation). In ictu oculi (talk) 10:37, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The reason for that is that we often get bogged down in trivia, " or no ", I or i, etc. missing the point that the current title is totally unrecognisable and ambiguous. This way everyone gets to give their preference. In ictu oculi (talk) 21:50, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Move to title suggested by bd2412, and redirect this title to the disambiguation page. This would be precise enough, but double quotes may be used when searching for an exact title. There's also the convention of using them around song titles (and several songs are listed on the disambiguation page). Peter James (talk) 20:07, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
User:BD2412 I have just followed up the " " issue in Google Books: Larkin (Guiness/Virgin) and Buckley (Rough Guide) don't have the " ". I have added both refs to article. Having said that I have no preference between I (A.R. Kane album) or "i" (A.R. Kane album), but I don't think it can stay at "i" when " " aren't on the cover and aren't in book sources. In ictu oculi (talk) 03:50, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I wonder if " " weren't added by original article creator because of not knowing how to template small so title appears as iota? In ictu oculi (talk) 03:52, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The letter i is not on the cover either; it is a picture of an eye - but no one calls the album "eye". There are sources that do use the quotation marks, which seems to me to be an unlikely accident. bd2412 T 04:04, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

bd2412 was right. --Walnuts go kapow (talk) 12:30, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]