Talk:ISO/IEC 9126

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 25 July 2007 by reviewer Hersfold (talk · contribs).

Internal vs. External measures

The article mentions internal and external measures. Are the internal, static measures things like inspections, reviews, etc.? Also, are the external measures dynamic, like execution testing?

Criticisms?

Any Criticisms on ISO 9126? I read in the ISO 9000 article that the ISO standards does not really apply to software engineering, so how about ISO 9126?

SQuaRE

SQuaRE (ISO 25000) is not a tailored view for COTS software but the replacement of ISO 9126. It includes a modified version of 9126. This information can be found in the public accessibe parts of ISO 25000. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.186.209.61 (talk) 21:54, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Update to new standard

Propose renaming article to new standard ISO/IEC 25010 and restructuring accordingly.David Condrey (talk) 04:29, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'd oppose this. 9126 is still in use, partly because it has been used so often in the past, partly because 25010 is so much bigger. So information specific to 9126 should be in Wikipedia. Perhaps an article combining information about the two would be a good option. Rp (talk) 08:10, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It would be very useful if Wikipedia could cover the new standard ISO/IEC 25010:2011 - it's now 3 years old, so to have no real information on it is a big oversight. Ianhowlett (talk) 12:37, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it would be better to rename the article and restructure it or otherwise make a new article for the new standard. The current situation redirecting the new standard to this page is confusing. 192.167.140.20 (talk) 14:20, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Five years on from the above, I feel it is well beyond time to reverse the primary and redirected pages... Andrew D Banks (talk) 12:38, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest we add a new page for the standard ISO/IEC 25010 (already existing in Dutch), and then refer from the ISO 9126 page. Anyone against this? Martin Op 't Land (talk) 12:48, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Having carried out some recent research around this standard, it appears that the ISO/IEC 25010:2011 has been superceeded by the ISO/IEC 25002:2024, as of March 2024. Could I suggest that this be reflected in this artlcle as well? Draugr Strigoi (talk) 10:32, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]