Talk:ISO/IEC 17025

Untitled

I suggest making any changes to ISO 17025 rathern than this article. Sagsaw 06:45, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Spam magnet?

How many of these organisations are notable? Are they all commercial? If the article includes ANY non-notable commercial organisations then of course everyone will want to add their own. Wikipedia is not a directory. -- John of Reading (talk) 16:52, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Titel of standard?

Shouldn't the official titel of the standard be presented to the reader? Thank you. Tom —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.1.78.115 (talk) 14:10, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup of article

The article formatting was a disaster. I correctly formatted a bunch of material in the article. While doing it, I noticed that it still needs a lot of love. There are a lot of statements that need citations but don't have them. Thus, I also added a refimprove template. Like so many articles I see, I'd love to dig in more, but I only have so much free time. Hopefully others can chip in.

Lostraven (talk) 22:38, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]