Talk:IRT New Lots Line/GA1

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Vami IV (talk · contribs) 02:51, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Opening statement

Hello, and come what may from this review, thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. During the review, I may make copyedits, which I will limit to spelling correction and minor changes to punctuation (removal of double spaces and such). I will only make substantive edits that change the flow and structure of the prose if I previously suggested and it is necessary. The Nominator(s) should understand that I am a grammar pedant, and I will nitpick in the interest of prose quality. For responding to my comments, please use Done, Fixed, Added, Not done, Doing..., or Removed, followed by any comment you'd like to make. I will be crossing out my comments as they are redressed, and only mine. A detailed, section-by-section review will follow. –♠Vami _IV†♠ 02:51, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Epicgenius: aaaa I forgot to ping you! –♠Vami _IV†♠ 15:52, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vami IV, no problem. epicgenius (talk) 16:30, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Kew Gardens 613: Finished my comments. –♠Vami _IV†♠ 12:22, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

~~Livonia Avenue Line[2]:129 This name only occurs once more in the article, with In August 1919, work on the Livonia Avenue Line was suspended [...].~~
- Done--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 22:31, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Utica Avenue in Crown Heights and continues to New Lots Avenue in East New York. "Utica Avenue" and "New Lots Avenue" should be followed by "station" to distinguish them from the neighborhoods they're located in.
- Done by @Epicgenius:--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 22:31, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
~~except for a short section above East 98th Street What neighborhood is E. 98th in?~~
- Done by @Epicgenius:--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 22:31, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Vami IV: I am ready for more comments whenever you are. Thanks.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 23:12, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

~~Citations [3], [4], [5] do not need to be in the lead.~~
- Done--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 12:34, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

History

~~This line was constructed as Route 31 Livonia Avenue Route. Too many "Route"s?~~
- Clarified. Done--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 13:30, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
~~its locations was not yet decided upon. Were?~~
- Done--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 13:28, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
~~[...] the three bids were rejected June 22. On June 8, [...] I'm confused. Firstly, on June 22. Secondly, June 8, and not 28th?~~
~~A new contract for the construction of the line was awarded by the PSC on January 17, 1917. To whom?~~
- I clarified this. Done--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 13:18, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
~~Why is May 1921 after May 1922 in "Opening"?~~
- Done--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 13:28, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
~~[...] with a two-car train operating on back and forth along [...] Should this "on" be here?~~
- Done--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 13:28, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
~~"Expansion plans" feels incomplete. What was the result of the 1951 study? Why all the "would"s in the third paragraph?~~
- @Vami IV: That article is all there is on the web about the study. I haven't found anything else. I dealt with the "would"s.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 18:47, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

~~Did the US Dept. of Transportation approve the NYCTA's grant request? A "yes" is implied by the opening of bidding by contractors, but not outright said.~~
- Done--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 16:14, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
~~Paragraphs 3 and 4 of "Station renovations" both begin with As part of [the MTA's [year] funding program, funding was provided...].~~
- Done--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 16:14, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extent and service

Consider "Route and service" for the title.
- Done--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 12:34, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
~~Can you discuss the line's stock and equipment here?~~
- @Vami IV and Epicgenius: Rolling stock is assigned by service, not by line, so I do not think it would make sense to include it here.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 12:34, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  This is correct. Lines are just the physical tracks and infrastructure, and services are the travel patterns that use rolling stock. See New York City Subway nomenclature for the explanation. epicgenius (talk) 13:14, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - Understood, marked off. –♠Vami _IV†♠ 02:38, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GA progress

Article passes CopyVio scanner. –♠Vami _IV†♠ 12:12, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Images are free/tagged and relevant to the article. –♠Vami _IV†♠ 12:12, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References are reliable. –♠Vami _IV†♠ 12:12, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.