Talk:IPA non-pulmonic consonant chart with audio

	This redirect was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This redirect was accepted from this draft on 26 May 2022 by reviewer Artem.G (talk · contribs).

Languages

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles

Linguistics: Phonetics

	Linguistics portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
	This redirect is supported by Phonetics Task Force.

Merge

I suggest we merge this article into IPA pulmonic consonant chart with audio and create one article for all consonants. There aren't many non-pulmonic consonants, and i don't think it requires an independent article. --Bageense^(disc.) 14:04, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Nardog (talk) 23:52, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that was quicker than expected. I made a small improvement in the new article, as explained in the edit summary. The headers may seem like a small obstacle, but given the large amount of pageviews, many readers may give up on viewing the tables.

Another idea: we could make a simplified IPA chart, similar to this one, either in the same article or in a new one, but probably in a new one, to keep the simplicity (too many tables in one page are confusing to the sight). --Bageense^(disc.) 13:31, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]