Jump to content

Talk:IOS 9/GA2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs) 01:12, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 01:12, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • and the ability to hold and select multiple photos easily, without having deleted it individually: what does this mean?
  • It also hides sensitive material through a new Hide option: presumably the app doesn't decide for itself what's sensitive, so this needs to be rephrased to refer to the user's actions.  Done -KAP03(Talk • Contributions • Email) 17:35, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think the reception section could be expanded; I would think there are quite a few more reviews out there that you don't mention. Of course you can't mention all of them, but there are some major news outlets such as the New York Times you could use: see here, for example. You don't have any major media organizations in the list of reviewers except for The Guardian. This is GA, not FA, so you don't have to have comprehensive coverage, but it would be good to look for a couple more major reviews and see what can be found.
  • The lawsuit over allegedly slowing the 4S with iOS 9 needs a little more than the short sentence you give it.  Done -KAP03(Talk • Contributions • Email) 16:11, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • What makes the following websites reliable sources? I'm not saying they're not, just checking since I don't recognize them and can't quickly find evidence that they qualify.
    • theappfactor.com
    • tekrevue.com
    • iphonehacks.com
    • igeeksblog.com

Other than that the article looks in good shape. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 11:21, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

KAP03: Just checking in; looks like it's been a week since the article was edited. Are you still working on the points above? Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 10:17, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Non-reviewer comments

[edit]

The following is missing quotation marks:

Comparison of texts
Text as it appears in the
IOS 9 article
Text as it appears in the
Source Material
An investigation ensued with collaboration from Lookout security company that revealed that if Mansoor had followed the link, it would have jailbroken his phone on the spot and implanted it with the spyware. If Mansoor had followed the link, it would have jailbroken his phone on the spot and implanted it with malware, capable of logging encrypted messages, activating the microphone and secretly tracking its movements.[1]
Citizen Lab linked the attack to a private Israeli spyware company known as NSO Group that sells Pegasus to governments for 'lawful interception'. Citizen Lab linked the attack to a private Israeli spyware company known as NSO group, although it’s unclear how the exploits were first discovered.[1]

References

  1. ^ a b Brandom, Russell (25 August 2016). "A serious attack on the iPhone was just seen in use for the first time". The Verge.
Spintendo ᔦᔭ 22:15, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

KAP03: Are you still planning to work on the remaining points? I will fail this in another week unless I hear that you're working on it. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 23:23, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Failing this as there has been no response on the two remaining points. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 12:09, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]