Talk:IMac Pro/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: David Fuchs (talk · contribs) 22:27, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Crisco 1492 (talk · contribs) 12:12, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Image review
[edit]- File:IMac Pro.svg - License is correct. Sticklers may say we need a photograph to ensure accurate representation, but looking at other images in the category, this is very representational. I hate that a product can be displayed accurately as an SVG — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:12, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Prose review
[edit]- languished for years without any updates - While it probably felt like that for Mac users, this feels very purple (and therefore non-neutral). Should be rephrased
- focus on dual graphics-processing unit (GPU) - is this missing an article? Or should dual graphics-processing unit be dual graphics-processing units?
- I've made some edits; please review.
- Earwig gives only 3.8% likelihood of copyvio, flagging only names and other elements that cannot be paraphrased. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:12, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Source review
[edit]- Per WP:CITESTYLE, we should ensure that the referencing style is consistent. Consequently, the capitalization of the references should be made consistent (compare [1] and [2], [7] and [8], etc.)
- Although it is not a GA criterion and does not affect the results of this review, I recommend archiving your online references to future-proof the article.
- Please ensure references are in numeric order (note [7][6], [22][6], [22][8])
- Spotchecks (based on this revision):
- [2]
- Supports: "new Mac Pro being developed", announcement of iMac Pro, small design focus on dual graphics-processing unit (GPU) had been a mistake
- [5]
- Supports: same chassis design as the 27-inch iMac (including screen etc.), jacks etc. (not cited for these, but supports them)
- [16]
- Supports: discontinuation and delisting; reviewing the article on MacRumours, despite the name it does appear sufficiently reliable for claims such as this.
- [22]
- Supports: Svelte frame, quiet, performance worth price
Conclusion
[edit]- Overall, this article and its presentation are excellent. Just a few nitpicks. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:12, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hey User:Crisco 1492, thanks for the review. I’m currently traveling but will be back at a stable connection in about five days, and will jump in on the changes. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 10:58, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- No worries, David Fuchs. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:04, 18 October 2024 (UTC)