Talk:IGG Software

This article was nominated for deletion on 25 February 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Notability

I found that IGG Software appeared notable for three reasons:

It was the original owner of Apple's trademark for iWork;

it has been the recipient of an Apple Design Award (runner-up);

it may be the top competitor to Intuit for personal finance software on the Mac (citation needed, so I did not state this explicitly - part of the rationale for listing the article as a stub).

Several other similar software firms have similarly structured wiki articles, with no more noteworthiness indicated and often with no citations. Surely it seems preferable to add to this stub as needed than to delete. Feedback welcome. That darn kat (talk) 19:45, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I re-added the notability tag (not a prod tag). Being nominated for one relatively small award doesn't seem to be enough for notability. As Wikipedia:Notability_(organizations_and_companies) says, has it "been the subject of significant coverage in secondary sources"? Please don't remove this unless the notability has been resolved, especially if you have a conflict of interest. tedder (talk) 02:02, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On second thought, you seem to have a conflict of interest with regards to this. I'm adding the prod tag. tedder (talk) 02:04, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]