Talk:IDGAF (Dua Lipa song)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Dua Lipa High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dua Lipa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dua Lipa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Dua LipaWikipedia:WikiProject Dua LipaTemplate:WikiProject Dua LipaDua Lipa articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Albania Low‑importance

	IDGAF (Dua Lipa song) is part of the WikiProject Albania, an attempt to co-ordinate articles relating to Albania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page so as to become familiar with the guidelines. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.AlbaniaWikipedia:WikiProject AlbaniaTemplate:WikiProject AlbaniaAlbania articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

IDGAF (Dua Lipa song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

IDGAF (Dua Lipa song) is part of the Dua Lipa (album) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 19, 2020	Good article nominee	Listed
September 5, 2021	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Requested move 12 January 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Za wl 16:27, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

IDGAF (Dua Lipa song) → IDGAF – Unnecessary dab page with only two main entries and the entries could be distinguished by hatnotes on each page. JE98 (talk) 17:08, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 20:16, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@JE98, In ictu oculi, and Paintspot: queried move request 20:17, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
target is a dab page, with 2Pac song and others, it's a common acronym. In ictu oculi (talk) 18:05, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I'm with Ictu on this one (I weakly oppose). This'll need discussion, probably. Paintspot Infez (talk) 18:48, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - song isn't primary for this, the abbreviation is. I am sure most visitors come looking for what it stands for, which is covered on the disambig page. -- Netoholic @ 06:19, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, primary topic is "I don't give a fuck". feminist (talk) 13:48, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - the argument brought by the opposed makes it sound like Wikipedia is the Urban Dictionary, but it's not. ×º°”˜`”°º×ηυηzια×º°”˜`”°º× 18:11, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, other topics with the IDGAF (or I.D.G.A.F) title, such as other songs by other artists. 2001:8003:2155:5B00:1D45:76D1:E389:7109 (talk) 05:50, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The primary topic is the abbreviation, and the target is a valid DAB page anyways. ---- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 05:06, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, "IDGAF" may be a genuine term that others might want to search up and it does not make sense to immediately link them ot an article they might have no interest on. After all, it's a colloquial acronym. Nahnah4 (talk | contribs | guestbook) 14:22, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 1 December 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved to the proposed title at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 02:06, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

IDGAF (Dua Lipa song) → IDGAF (song) – 2Pac's song is not called "IDGAF" - it's spelt out in full. Unreal7 (talk) 16:10, 1 December 2018 (UTC)--Relisted. –Ammarpad (talk) 19:34, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Of the eleven entries at the DAB, nine are songs and possibly what a reader is wanting when they search for IDGAF. Andrewa (talk) 16:39, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

We came to consensus a long time ago not to use the artist's name if only one song has an article. Unreal7 (talk) 21:07, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Where? Maybe that decision should be revisited in view of this particular case. Andrewa (talk) 01:01, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Here. Unreal7 (talk) 14:55, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Very interesting. That RfC was based on three examples, two of which were subsequently moved. But the third was not (and I now see that the RM in question was also proposed by yourself). If this RM is also rejected, that RfC does need to be revisited, as its conclusions may have been far too sweeping. Were there any changes to WP:AT as a result of this RfC on its talk page? Andrewa (talk) 18:40, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. not enough to differentiate. Current solution is the best per WP:NOPRIMARY and WP:INCDAB. -- Netoholic @ 09:40, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. No WP:PTOPIC. Creating one will (a) annoy and/or confuse readers who were looking for something else, and (b) guarantee that bad links to the PTOPIC will accumulate, degrading the encyclopaedia. Narky Blert (talk) 10:49, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:IDGAF (Dua Lipa song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Ultimate Boss (talk · contribs) 16:20, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
No problems.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
Ok.
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
Ok.
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Ok.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Requested move 3 January 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 10:59, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

IDGAF (Dua Lipa song) → IDGAF
IDGAF → IDGAF (disambiguation)

– I know this has been discussed a lot in the past, but it doesn't really make sense for this to be specified when there are no other articles for other songs titled "IDGAF". The article for the 2Pac is titled "I Don't Give a Fuck" so this clearly doesn't violate. Also, I think this probably now qualifies for WP:PTOPIC as this song is the only single release with an article and it has charted far more and has far more notability than the 2Pac song. If this doesn't work out, I think it might be wise to move to IDGAF (song) otherwise. LOVI 33 01:54, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Very strong oppose - as the dab page says IDGAF is an acronym for "I don't give a fuck". It may refer to:
"I Don't Give a Fuck", also known as "IDGAF", a song by 2Pac
"IDGAF" (Dua Lipa song), a song by English singer Dua Lipa on her eponymous 2017 album
"IDGAF" (featuring Pharrell & T.I.), a song on the 2013 Nelly album M.O.
"IDGAF", a song by CJ Fly on the 2016 album Flytrap
"IDGAF", a song by Ängie released in 2019
"I.D.G.A.F.", a song by American band Breathe Carolina from the 2009 album Hello Fascination
"I.D.G.A.F.", a song by American rapper Daz Dilly from the 2014 album Weed Money
#IDGAF, a 2013 mixtape by Ludacris
IDGAF, a 2013 music video featuring Snootie Wild
"IDGAF Suite", a song written by Kevin Eubanks and recorded by Billy Hart on the 1985 album Oshumare
"IDGAF", a song by Lil Peep on his last album Come Over When You're Sober, Pt. 2

There clearly is a primary topic, the acronym. And how does it help Dua Lipa fans removing her name? In ictu oculi (talk) 15:55, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In ictu oculi thanks for putting this forward. I never really thought of the acronym being the primary topic. Perhaps a move to IDGAF (song) is more suitable. LOVI 33 22:24, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Strong oppose – this song is definitely not the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. The title of this song is literally based on the acronym itself, which has far more long-term significance than a pop song that will be forgotten in two years. However, I do not oppose a move to IDGAF (song), as this is the only song titled "IDGAF" with an article on Wikipedia, but disambiguationists won't support this either. Hayman30 (talk) 09:31, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose per IIO and Hayman30 - The acronym is more notable than the song. Would support moving to IDGAF (song) tho as per Hayman. –Davey2010^Talk 11:04, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support I only agree to change from IDGAF (Dua Lipa song) to IDGAF (song) because it is the most notable song that exists with that acronym. - Alexismata7 (talk) 14:39, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, that's not really support, because you're proposing something different. — BarrelProof (talk) 20:06, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Requested move 14 January 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved (closed by non-admin page mover) BegbertBiggs (talk) 23:20, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

IDGAF (Dua Lipa song) → IDGAF (song) – I think I pretty much got a consensus for this with my last move, but there really isn't a need to specify whose song this is when there isn't another song with an article and the same title of "IDGAF". The only close one is the 2Pac song, but that one spells out the acronym so I really cannot think of a reason why this shouldn't be titled IDGAF (song). LOVI 33 15:01, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support I totally agree. It's most notable article with the acronym. Alexismata7 (talk) 23:49, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per my comment in the previous move discussion. Hayman30 (talk) 08:32, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Another Move Request

All of the page move requests above are now superseded by the fact that more songs titled simply "IDGAF" have been released since early 2021 and some have their own WP articles, as can be seen in the rapidly-expanding list at the IDGAF disambiguation page. Per a request at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests, this article is going back to IDGAF (Dua Lipa song). I don't think this will be too controversial, if everyone considers how the situation has changed in the past 2.5 years. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 00:53, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]