Talk:ICasualties.org

	This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Military history: Middle East

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Middle Eastern military history task force

Claim of errors

A non-logged in user made repeated claims that there were discrepencies between the DoD reports and iCasualties. They were, appropriately, removed from the article as being original research, not supported by outside sources. The editor provided two examples visible in this revision. Checking them as of now (the iCasualties page has changed, it's now: http://icasualties.org/Iraq/USDeathsByService.aspx ), the both errors appears to still be there. It does not seem surprising that errors such as that would creep into a large database, indeed it would be more surprising if none could be found, but it does seem like something worth mentioning here on the talk page. 75.217.0.220 (talk) 20:51, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Independence issue

As of 12/30, CNN.com just did a major profile on White, which confirms that he owns the site and pays for it himself. That would provide a citation needed for the 'fact' question of whether the site is independent. Here is that link:

http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/11/30/keeper.of.death/index.html

Dioxinfreak (talk) 08:40, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Icasualties.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Icasualties.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 08:28, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on ICasualties.org. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160204203958/http://icasualties.org/ to http://icasualties.org/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050628212100/http://icasualties.org/oif/ to http://icasualties.org/oif/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:02, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on ICasualties.org. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101212075113/http://www.thetakeaway.org/blogs/takeaway/2010/feb/23/reporting-hard-number-afghanistan/ to http://www.thetakeaway.org/blogs/takeaway/2010/feb/23/reporting-hard-number-afghanistan/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:38, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]