Talk:ICT Group (Russia)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reverted Content
[edit]Hi,
On 9 December 2011 the article was reverted by HJ Mitchell. I would be grateful if the version that was reverted could be reviewed as a large quantity of useful and referenced content has been lost. I'd like to seek some advice first before requesting help from elsewhere. Thanks Vjdigital (talk) 14:02, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ICT_Group_(Russia)&oldid=458804936
- When viewing the page, press the "view history" button on the top right - left of the search box - then select the version you want to view..
- It's not clear why the text was removed. However please note that the current version is entirely sourced and referenced. Please don't make any retrograde steps by adding unsourced material - as per WP:VERIFY.
- Because the article is currently referenced I would like to be strict on any further introductions
- In particular the old "history" and "overview" sections are very wooly, with the old overview section being essentially unreferenced with the three references only comfierming minor parts. It was also out of date (ie shipyards).Oranjblud (talk) 19:31, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
- I have left a message at User_talk:HJ_Mitchell#ICT_Group.Oranjblud (talk) 19:34, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
Recovery
[edit]I've looked at the old version - apart from " Bangladesh Internet Exchange" and 5% of " Piraeus Bank" (which seem small scale = should they be mentioned) all investments are mentioed
I've put some of the images in the linked articles where they are more relevent. The unused images are File:ICT Construction.jpg File:Khanty-Mansi Bank.jpg File:Nomos Bank.jpg. I'm not sure about using this type of image in the article of a holding company as it starts to look like a glossy corporate brochure ie advert.
That leaves as far as I can see only the chronology missing (the current coverage is not identical - but covers in the same topics - much of the detail on individual companies should be in the linked articles). I have no issue with the chronology going back in, even though it doesn't currently have a source. It looks like the section was removed because it is a copyvio from http://www.ict-group.ru/english/about/history/timeline/
I'm not sure if the info on Uralkali is up to date. According to http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A3%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%BA%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%B9 it has merged with another company . http://www.gazeta.ru/business/2011/04/19/3588681.shtml says A. Nexis's share increased to 17.7% - as long as the reports fail to distinguish between oligarches and legal entities the information is useless unfortunately. Oranjblud (talk) 14:51, 4 April 2012 (UTC)