Talk:ICBM address

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

Redundant

Elevation is implied by the Geographic Location, so this quote is redundant; "(A real missile address would include target elevation.)"

That depends. If the ICBM was set to detonate on impact, then that would be correct. However, if it was set to detonate at altitude, then the elevation of the detonation would be needed. StuRat 16:40, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The photo as of 2010-09-04 is of an SLBM, not an ICBM. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.96.131.164 (talk) 01:06, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

interpretation as "how to kill me[the user]"

an arc second is about 30 metres^[1]. Is the ICBM address a joke about that the user can be killed by an missile strike at that location, as in "in case a government has to kill me, shot here" 2A02:810B:C040:1DF4:A515:7438:9D4:9B2E (talk) 16:35, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Precision_of_coordinates

[1] ttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Precision_of_coordinates

[1]