Talk:IB Group 4 subjects

Excessive detail

I'm skeptical that it makes sense to go into as much detail as this article does, especially if the curriculum changes from year to year. Any opinions? Tim Pierce (talk) 12:04, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tim, I agree with you, there's a bit too much detail here (though I should point out that the curriculum doesn't usually change year to year; instead, there is a scheduled 6-year review cycle for all courses). Maybe we can get someone in here to tidy things up a bit. Regards, CinchBug | Talk 16:54, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It wouldn't be so bad, but the amount of detail is inconsistent, for example, there is a complete list of all the subjects studied within chemistry and biology, but nothing on physics, etc, and there is a lot more information that other IB subjects. Perhaps if somebody filled in the gaps, and improved consistency, it would improve the article. curt ﾂ 22:10, 8 June 2010 (UTC) Curt Molloy

Removal of links

I removed some inappropriate links, namely:

[1] which infringes on copyright and [2] (dead link).

For further information or if you believe I am mistaken, please see the discussion at Talk:IB_Diploma_Programme on 2 July 2009. I'll return at some point to help provide solid citations from legitimate sources. Regards, CinchBug | Talk 22:52, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment

I've tried to address the "Multiple issues" flagged on this page for a long time. The only thing I'm still concerned about is the detail in the "Structure and Assessment" section. I'm not involved in the IB and can't find this stuff on their open website - so I wonder if it's appropriate and invariant. Could someone with better knowledge take a look at the section and make changes?

I'm also trying to add something on Design Technology to fill that gap, but I've only found things on secondary sites. It's a relatively new course but it's surprising not to find much more. Is what I've added representative? Chris55 (talk) 10:56, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on IB Group 4 subjects. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:32, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]