Talk:IBM T220/T221 LCD monitors

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Roentgen

Didn't this monitor start off with the code name "Roentgen"? I thought "Big Bertha" was the code name of the second generation model.24.83.178.11 10:11, 27 October 2007 (UTC)BeeCier[reply]

Roentgen refers to a 2560x2048 panel in the 16" range (I forget the exact number offhand) with the same PPI. Big Bertha is the Roentgen technology in a larger form factor. Bhtooefr (talk) 04:38, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Response Time

The specified response time for this monitor is 62ms to refresh the image on the screen. Viewsonic and IBM have also reported the same number. IDtech refers to refresh as Image Formation Time

http://www.idtech.co.jp/en/products/pdf/IDT-B2B6_ENG_04Jan28.pdf —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.125.89.33 (talk) 02:33, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

VP2290 redirect needed

It could use a VP2290 redirect unless someone thinks it would be a bad idea. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.254.81.114 (talk) 00:09, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article needs a reorganization, but want to discuss what the best way to do that would be

Really, there appear to be three generations of this family.

The T220 (9503-DG0), the T221 (9503-DG1 and DG3) and various clones such as the Viewsonic and Iiyama displays, and the T221 (9503-DG5, DGP, and DGM).

I'm kinda thinking of breaking it into those three sections, and grouping the clones with their related T221 model.

Also, the DGM is a bit of an oddball - it's the DG5 hardware, but 41 Hz. There's a citation on a private Yahoo Groups message, but I'm looking for a better one.

Any thoughts before I do any of that? Bhtooefr (talk) 14:56, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Are there photos and documents on the other models? All three seem very similar and some what obscure (and I say that as a T221 owner) and I don't see the need to split the article. Reorganize, sure. -- 23:32, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on IBM T220/T221 LCD monitors. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:31, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on IBM T220/T221 LCD monitors. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120528104153/http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/1180.wss to http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/1180.wss

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:06, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]