Talk:IBM System/3

Computing Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force.

Some questions and quibbles

Ah, the System/3. I knew it well. My family business got one when I was 14 (1969, one of the first ones delivered in Colorado) and I spent many a happy night and weekend programming it when I should have been smoking dope and chasing girls.

I'm making a few corrections, though.

First, the lowest-end System/3 used only the 96 column cards. No "mass storage" --- such as it was --- at all. Eight K of memory. It literally wasn't powerful enough, in many ways, to provide the power behind a musical greeting card today. Adding disk storage made it a mid-range System/3. Second, it's hardly fair to claim the whole System/38 line was based on a failure, since it led to the whole System/38 line, which is still available in the AS/400 and iSeries. --- Charlie (Colorado) (talk) 18:14, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Does anyone remember the third party light sensitive device that sat over the 'stick lights' so you could have an audible warning for errors? --- James Robertson 13 Dec 2014. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.139.182.127 (talk) 10:04, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RPG

The System/3 didn't "introduce the RPG language," which was in use at least as far back as the 1960s on System/360 - it was the primary language on the 360/20. Possibly the article is talking about RPG II? Peter Flass (talk) 07:07, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

CPU speed?

Does anyone know the CPU speed, either clock speed or instructions per second? BMJ-pdx (talk) 09:20, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

According to http://www.ibmsystem3.nl/hardware.html and https://www.computerhistory.org/collections/catalog/102667928 and elsewhere, its instruction cycle was 1.52 microseconds, but http://bitsavers.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de/pdf/ibm/system3/fe/System_3_Model_4_Model_8_Seminar_Oct76.pdf gives 480 nanoseconds. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 10:10, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]