Talk:IBM Displaywriter System

Brands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Fair use rationale for Image:Ibm displaywriter.jpg

Image:Ibm displaywriter.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:09, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

is/was? available

IBM Displaywrite says to see here about IBM DisplayWrite/370, which it claims is still available. Here there is no mention of /370 and the past tense is used? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pantergraph (talk • contribs) 17:44, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relation to DisplayWrite software

I'm removing the following sentence "The Displaywriter's word processing software was later ported to the IBM PC and to larger IBM computing platforms as IBM DisplayWrite." The similiarity in names is purely for marketing reasons. The DisplayWrite application was not a "port" of the software. It was, in fact, significantly different in its architecture and UI. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.17.218.82 (talk) 18:47, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to add something back. Agreed it was not a "port", but the menu interface was similar to ease the transition for experienced Displaywriter operators. Peter Flass (talk) 18:04, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:IBM Displaywriter.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:IBM Displaywriter.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:IBM Displaywriter.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:08, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

overstatement

in 1984, IBM announced "DisplayWrite", an almost exact replica of the Displaywriter Textpack for the IBM Personal Computer line, making the Displaywriter truly obsolete.

The quality of the beam spring keyboard included with the Displaywriter wasn't available for PCs of the time, correct? I would revise "truly obsolete." For some professional writers, build quality and ease of use would have been the top criteria, not versatility (being able to run other software like a general PC). 107.77.195.33 (talk) 00:50, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Our secretaries, etc. hated DisplayWrite. Not just the keyboard, but the quality of the PC display was not was good. Peter Flass (talk) 20:02, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do you two have sources to support that sentiment? Based on what I've read sales of the Displaywriter dropped off sharply in 1983 and 1984 and the system was universally panned as being functionally dead. Also the Displaywriter display and the PC 5151 monochrome display use the same tube so resolution of text was identical, if not better on the PC if the PC used a 5153 or 5154 etc. Stank Tater (talk) 12:13, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately it's anecdotal, but I spoke to a lot of secretaries at the time and they hted the replacement. Peter Flass (talk) 17:24, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]