Talk:IBM 702

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Early computers task force (assessed as High-importance).

Williams tubes

The IBM 701 is stated to have 1024 bits / tube. This article for the 702 says 1000 bits / tube. I am guessing that should also be 1024 bits. Wizzy…☎ 17:26, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The 702 was decimal and thus the tubes probably held 1000 bits each. I was at IBM just a bit later and the lore was that the 702 was withdrawn because the Williams tubes were not sufficiently reliable for business applications. NormHardy (talk) 06:49, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on IBM 702. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20030216135550/http://www.computer50.org/kgill/williams/williams.html to http://www.computer50.org/kgill/williams/williams.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:39, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]