Talk:IBM 5250

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the IBM 5250 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

List of clients removed

I've now twice removed the list of "Known 5250 Clients", as this falls under what Wikipedia is not -- none of them have an article of their own, such a list is unencyclopedic, and it appears to be productspam. //Blaxthos ( t / c ) 12:27, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's funny I was thinking of adding just such a list. If an entry were made for each item to be added it would then be encyclopedic? Software is pretty abstract, we could make specifications for anything... it isn't like the laws of physics without a mention of implementation something like 5250 isn't very useful to the general public. Further there are widely implemented specifications such as FTP, and Telnet. FTP links to "Comparison of FTP client software" and Telnet does have a list of clients internal to the document. While these protocols are well known and easy to find implementations for (particularly free ones), this is not so obvious for 5250 and so is of increased value to this topic and I feel the next time someone submits a list it be kept. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.18.239.235 (talk) 18:05, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

5555

How does the "5555" fit? Was this only an emulated device? I can't seem to find a description. Peter Flass (talk) 12:59, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]