Talk:I-35W Minnesota River bridge

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Minnesota Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Minnesota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Purpose

A main purpose of this article is that information about I-35W Minnesota River bridge is being confused in the media as being information about the 2007 collapsed I-35W Mississippi River bridge. Both bridges are located in Minneapolis and both have similar sounding names. There is enought WP:RS material to develop this I-35W Minnesota River bridge article. Please give it time to develop. Thank you. -- Jreferee ^(Talk) 17:29, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

History Section

Is the history section necessary? It includes a bunch of trivia, none of which is particularly interesting. Perhaps it could be removed. Globe199 14:16, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Trivia which may be relevant is expected to accumulate until it becomes apparent whether something is useful or not. Trivia can give clues toward new material. (SEWilco 02:44, 8 August 2007 (UTC))[reply]