Talk:I, Robot (short story)

Novels: Short story / Sci-fi Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Short story task force.
	This article is supported by Science fiction task force.

Fair use rationale for Image:Jan 39 Amazing.jpg

Image:Jan 39 Amazing.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:25, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced deleted image, the copyright has expired. Go to Amazing Stories January 1939.jpg, or see more images on Amazing Stories for other examples and copyright information. Fixblor (talk) 05:25, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion

Surely this should be moved to Talk:I, Robot (story) or Talk:I, Robot (novel) or something along those lines?--Tmwps (talk) 16:51, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adaptations

The Binder stories were adapted in EC (Entertaining Comics) publications:

"I, Robot," adapted by Al Feldstein and illustrated by Joe Orlando, in Weird Science-Fantasy #27, January-February 1955; "The Trial of Adam Link," adapted by Al Feldstein and illustrated by Joe Orlando, in Weird Science-Fantasy #28, March-April 1955; and "Adam Link in Business," adapted by Al Feldstein and illustrated by Joe Orlando, in Weird Science-Fantasy #29, May-June 1955.

Orlando did new artwork for the 1960s adaptations in Creepy.

WHPratt (talk) 05:03, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Add all of that in there. Citation needed, of course. Fixblor (talk) 05:30, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What would one need to cite besides the magazines themselves? WHPratt (talk) 20:01, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I added the information on the story and the sequels. These lists would probably fit better into the Eando Binder article (with a crossreference here), if someonre wants to move them. WHPratt (talk) 13:20, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:I, Robot (short story)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Surely this should be moved to Talk:I, Robot (story) or Talk:I, Robot (novel) or something along those lines?--Tmwps (talk) 16:51, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 16:51, 13 March 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 18:39, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Merge from Adam Link

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The Result was no consensus as per WP:Consensus. Merge discussion closed. --Whiteguru (talk) 09:32, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

While I appreciate User:Toughpigs expanding this, I am still concerned this character is not notable, and neither is the "Adam Link" series. But some content here, most, perhaps, could survive in the I, Robot (short story). I'll note that some content is already duplicated and exists in both entries (such as influence on Asimov); and a good half of the reception/analysis in Adam Link is about I, Robot. Adding the 'Adam Link' section here would strenghten this article, with virutally no loss of content after a proper merge and redirect. Thoughts? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:44, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.