Talk:I'm with Her (TV series)

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Requested move 3 December 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved as proposed, the general consensus is that there is no primary topic for this phrase. (non-admin closure) Iffy★Chat -- 12:58, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

– While the TV show is popular, pageviews and everything, it's not very notable in the long-term. The slogan is really not that significant anymore; note that Clinton very likely won't run again [1]. I'm with her will also redirect to the disambiguation page if this RM passes. wumbolo ^^^ 19:55, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Champion, Thryduulf, CoffeeWithMarkets, Mihirpmehta, Daß Wölf, Grondemar, Tavix, Godsy, AngusWOOF, and Arthur Rubin: Pinging participants of Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 December 20#I'm with her, most of whom already provided their opinion there. wumbolo ^^^ 20:03, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support dab As a recentism, the campaign is probably more notable than the TV series at this point, and it's crystal whether Hillary will run again in 2020. The band has also gained notoriety. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:11, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The band is primary based on both general Google searches and searches restricted to the past six and three months. What matters is what the primary topic is now, as that's what people will mostly be searching for. The primary topic can change (as indeed it has since the RfD), and if/when that happens this can be revisited again but we should not be titling our articles based on what we think will or won't be primary in the future. Thryduulf (talk) 23:39, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support dab per nom / per above. NO primary topic. (If some people are arguing that the TV series is the primary topic, and some people say the band's the primary topic, and some people say the slogan's the primary topic - it's probably best to have a disambiguation page at the basename.) Paintspot Infez (talk) 01:23, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.