Talk:Hythe, Hampshire
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Town or village?
[edit]I'm confused. On some websites i read that this is a village and on others a town. Which is it? Simply south 23:12, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- There's some debate about the definition of the difference, but the rules of thumb we use on Wikipedia are around the naming of the local government structures:
- If the borough/district in which the settlement sits is named after the settlement (such as the Borough of Eastleigh being named after Eastleigh), the settlement is likely to be a town. There are exceptions to this, such as the borough of Basingstoke and Deane which was named after the largest and smallest settlements in the borough (nobody thinks Deane is a town!). In Hythe's case, the borough/district council is the New Forest District Council, so Hythe isn't a town by that criterion.
- If the parish council refers to itself as a town council, the settlement is a town. In Hythe's case, the parish council is Hythe and Dibden Parish Council, so again Hythe isn't a town by that criterion.
- So in summary, using the definition laid out in Town#United_Kingdom, Hythe is a village (a large one, but a village nonetheless) not a town. But that article also says, quite correctly, "Not all settlements which are commonly described as towns have a 'Town Council' or 'Borough Council'" so the question is how commonly is Hythe described as a town? As you say, there's a mixture of opinion. Because there's no overriding consensus, it's probably safest to fall back on the two criteria above and refer to Hythe as a village. Hope this helps, Waggers 07:57, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- The settlement website identifies Hythe as a village and yet the county council identifies Hythe as a town. Simply south 12:05, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
It's a town, as there are signposts in the town with "town centre" on it. Pch172 (talk) 14:19, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Hythe, Hampshire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929181745/http://www.hythe-hants.org.uk/Hythe-History/Hythe-History-Homepage.html to http://www.hythe-hants.org.uk/Hythe-History/Hythe-History-Homepage.html
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/relationships.jsp?u_id=10207897&c_id=10001043 - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090603203456/http://www.hytheanddibden.gov.uk/index.cfm?articleid=196 to http://www.hytheanddibden.gov.uk/index.cfm?articleid=196
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110812005533/http://www.hytheanddibden.gov.uk/index.cfm to http://www.hytheanddibden.gov.uk/index.cfm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929181745/http://www.hythe-hants.org.uk/Hythe-History/Hythe-History-Homepage.html to http://www.hythe-hants.org.uk/Hythe-History/Hythe-History-Homepage.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:36, 9 November 2017 (UTC)