Talk:Hypha

Fungi Top‑importance

	Fungi portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fungi, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fungi on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FungiWikipedia:WikiProject FungiTemplate:WikiProject FungiFungi articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Microbiology High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microbiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microbiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrobiologyWikipedia:WikiProject MicrobiologyTemplate:WikiProject MicrobiologyMicrobiology articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

comment

I believe that discussion of growth of hyphae is important, so I'm going to try to add it. Lotusduck 18:49, 13 November 2005 (UTC)lotusduck[reply]

I cannot imagine how the growth of hyphae should work. Is there somebody that might express this more simply? --80.109.81.30 18:56, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't copy and paste articles to wikipedia unless they are freely licensed. This one was not as far as I could tell. If you have permission to release the article under GFDL from the copyright holder or are the copyright author releasing the article under GFDL please correct me. Discordance 12:31, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What nonsense is this?

What ON EARTH is that comment about "Hyphaes are lil' silver root-like stuff that makes mushrooms not die" doing here!? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 212.96.222.122 (talk) 14:11, 30 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

The vandalism has been reverted. -Adrian J. Hunter 14:01, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removed Hyphae.jpg

I removed the pic on the right because I fear it could be misleading. The picture shows macroscopic structures which readers might assume to be individual hyphae; of course hyphae themselves are microscopic. This pic might be better on a page like mycelium. –Adrian J. Hunter 13:34, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Contradiction

The following tag was added relating to E. J. H. Corner's terms.

But I think the references made it pretty clear that he introduced the terms monomitic, dimitic & trimitic in 1933, and later in a 1966 paper added terms like sarcodimitic, sarcotrimitic etc. I added the phrase "as a later refinement" to make this even clearer. Is this OK? Strobilomyces (talk) 20:11, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Strobilomyces. I added the contradict tag over a year ago when I couldn't access the sources, though looking at this article again I realise the intended meaning was discernable without them. It's clearer now. Adrian J. Hunter^{(talk•contribs)} 03:09, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the hint about Template:Nospam. Strobilomyces (talk) 19:36, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hyphopodia

I think something should be said about this type of hyphal branch as it's used thoroughly in literature - I have no real background in mycology so anyone who does and knows about this should address it. Lenny (talk) 06:55, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hypha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081207081944/http://www.mycology.adelaide.edu.au/Mycoses/Opportunistic/Aspergillosis/ to http://www.mycology.adelaide.edu.au/Mycoses/Opportunistic/Aspergillosis/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:56, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hypha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:05, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]