This article is part of WikiProject Hypericaceae, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the plant family Hypericaceae and related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.HypericaceaeWikipedia:WikiProject HypericaceaeTemplate:WikiProject HypericaceaeHypericaceae articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal articles
Find correct name
The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere.
The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo.
Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box).
A fact from Hypericum foliosum appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 17 February 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Lead: "and was then placed into section Androsaemum" ... 2 centuries later: I suggest we split the sentence and drop the "then", given the distance in time.
Changed to "later"
"hydrocarbons; it also has significant concentrations" - suggest "hydrocarbons, and significant concentrations".
Done
"and antihypertensive." -> "and antihypertensive properties." There is a slight danger here that we are endorsing all these (supposed) properties as genuine but it's probably ok here.
Changed to "for ... purposes" to address that, I think that softens the chance of endorsement a little. If you have other verbiage suggestions, by all means
Description: text is pretty clear to those of us with a biology background; the links are certainly a good contribution to intelligibility, but a diagram would still be very useful for the general reader.
Added simple diagram from the Robson article, hopefully it's helpful
Similar species: "told apart from H. grandifolium because it has" -> "told apart from H. grandifolium by its".
Done
Chemistry: "pinene also sometimes made up" -> "pinene sometimes can make up".
Done
Taxonomy: Tree is too cramped, suggest increase the text size (to 100%, along with the line spacing), and the box width. "on a 2013 study": yes, but "on Meseguer et al 2013" would be more informative.
Let me know if that is better, not particularly knowledgeable with cladograms
Suggest you mention that the Androsaemum group is Old World, per Meseguer.
Done
Etymology: what's it doing down here? Top of the article would be better and more usual, or perhaps top of 'Taxonomy' I suppose if you really want to keep it out of sight.
Totally valid, moved up
Ecology: "aecia and telia": now these terms are genuinely obscure to all but mycologists, so please provide brief text glosses for them: if indeed they need to be mentioned here at all. Better really would be an image, and a brief mention of how damaging the rust fungus is, rather than the names of its various parts, i.e. "The rust fungus ... infects the plant, causing mild/moderate/serious damage to the leaves" (or whatever).
Done
Uses: "in similar ways to other species in the genus": maybe mention this is antidepressant (from Hypericin, etc); it's very well documented, unlike much herbal medicine: you probably should cite it specifically.
I haven't actually been able to find anything on hypericin in this guy, unusually. Maybe I just missed it, but antidepressant capabilities don't seem like this species' forte. That phrase was more to communicate that the authors found that locals said (paraphrasing obv), "yeah we use this plant to fix messed up medical stuff like all the other ones that look like it around here"
OK that's genuinely surprising. Evolution can lose almost anything (except the genetic code), I guess.
"It also has antioxidant properties that derive from its carotenoid and phenolic oils." would be better as "Its carotenoids and phenolic oils give it antioxidant properties."
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
... that Hypericum foliosum "shines" because of carotenoid compounds? Source: Rainha, Nuno; Lima, Elisabete; Baptista, José; Rodrigues, Carolina (2011). "Antioxidant properties, total phenolic, total carotenoid and chlorophyll content of anatomical parts of Hypericum foliosum". Journal of Medicinal Plants Research, page 1933. Aiton, William; Bauer, Franz Andreas; Sowerby, James; Ehret, Georg Dionysius; Nicol, George (1789). Hortus Kewensis, or, A catalogue of the plants cultivated in the Royal Botanic Garden at Kew. Vol. 3. London, page 104.
That looks fine now, thanks Fritzmann, however, because the source is offline, I will have to ask you to put a cite directly behind the relevant sentence in the article - thanks. Gatoclass (talk) 09:22, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
Interesting:
QPQ: Done.
Overall: Fritzmann2002, the DYK rules specify that the cite must come at the end of the sentence in which the hook fact appears. Normally, I don't worry about this if the hook fact can be readily verified online, but for an offline source, it is generally necessary because otherwise we can get complaints when the nom goes to the main page. I have therefore added the additional cite, but you are perfectly welcome to remove it after the article has appeared if you prefer. Gatoclass (talk) 14:35, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]