Talk:Hyperballad

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Björk, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BjörkWikipedia:WikiProject BjörkTemplate:WikiProject BjörkBjörk articles

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Comment

"The musical structure is unconventional as the beats begin at a very slow tempo but speed up as the song progresses, and it ends at a high tempo."

This is not true. The beats get more pronounced as the song progresses, but the tempo of this song does not change. In fact, the only tempo change in the entire song is the last few measures, when there is actually a ritard...making the tempo slower, if anything.

That was in the main article, I moved it to talk. I wish that person would have signed or at least known where to put it.--66.68.45.213 22:34, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Song title

Is the correct title "Hyper-Ballad" or "Hyperballad"? The cover image clearly shows "Hyperballad". Perhaps the page needs renaming. — AnemoneProjectors (zomg!) 12:36, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone want to comment as it was just changed. — AnemoneProjectors (会話) 12:31, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Bjork Hyper.jpg

Image:Bjork Hyper.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:05, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Bjork - Hyperballad Enjoy.jpeg

The image File:Bjork - Hyperballad Enjoy.jpeg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --20:31, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

motion control system

motion control system = Motion control photography? --Abdull (talk) 10:10, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary "versions" section

Is the "Official versions" section really necessary? Most of these are listed in the different forms of the track listing or elsewhere in the article. AssortedLiquorice (talk) 12:15, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the section from the latest revision. AssortedLiquorice (talk) 15:44, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How it is unnecessary? There's no clear list of versions anywhere. To work out versions from the article will take a hour of work. Then, that section contains extra info about the same remixes under different titles. Shimenawa (talk) 09:41, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Track listing section is erroneous

I see at least 4 mistakes in release country (discogs has a different view). Some track titles seem to be wrong too (for example for UK CD promo). Shimenawa (talk) 09:41, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hyperballad. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071011072801/http://unit.bjork.com/specials/gh/SUB-02/index.htm to http://unit.bjork.com/specials/gh/SUB-02/index.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:54, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hyperballad. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:17, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]