Talk:Hymnbooks of the Church of Scotland

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christian music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christian music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Christian musicWikipedia:WikiProject Christian musicTemplate:WikiProject Christian musicChristian music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Christianity: Reformed Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Reformed Christianity portal This article is supported by WikiProject Reformed Christianity.

Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merger proposal

I would suggest that the current Church Hymnary article be merged into this one, as it essentially duplicates a subset of the content. That article could then simply be redirected here. Seajay (talk) 10:05, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Church Hymnary seems to consist mostly of paragraphs taken from here anyway, with one short and not very objective paragraph added about what evangelical churches think of it - what other denominations think is really not relevant. (Or do we want a Catholic comment, and perhaps a Muslim one?). So yes, merge. --Doric Loon (talk) 13:04, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Completed merge Seajay (talk) 10:24, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Further History

Looking at this site http://www.cgmusic.com/workshop/scot1635_frame.htm it appears that there are further historical versions dating back before 1650. The one on the page linked is the 1635 Scottish Psalter, the description of which refers to, what may be the first version of 1564. It also gives quotes from the general assembly denoting the use of the 1564 publication. We should probably add something to do with these versions into this page. Seajay (talk) 10:42, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please do. But nothing pre-Reformation. That would belong elsewhere. --Doric Loon (talk) 13:05, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hymnbooks of the Church of Scotland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110726093536/http://www.reformation-scotland.org.uk/documents/development-of-scottish-psalter.pdf to http://www.reformation-scotland.org.uk/documents/development-of-scottish-psalter.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:59, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Advertisement like language

“Church Hymnary, fourth edition (2005)” seems to have been copied from a book seller, reading like a review, not a objective description. Various examples of bias present as well, and no references.

Could someone with more experience than me give some advice? Worcester1264 (talk) 02:42, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New Supplement to CH 4

New Supplement to CH 4 https://books.google.co.za/books/about/God_Welcomes_All_Full_Music_Edition.html?id=8Z1X0AEACAAJ&source=kp_book_description&redir_esc=y 41.113.132.163 (talk) 10:10, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]