Talk:Hyla

	Hyla is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Changes in the taxon name

In 2005, Faivovich et al. revised the status of the family Hylidae (Rafinesque, 1815) and divided the genus Hyla into many revived genus only with this purpose (Hyloscirtus, Hypsiboas, Dendropsophus etc...). The whole document can be found on the web.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 168.176.160.15 (talk • contribs) 21:04, 1 July 2006.

Why not go ahead and bring the changes into WP? Don't forget to include all links from Hyla and cross-reference the new genera back to Hyla--GRM 21:45, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Author(itie)s for/of scientific names

It seems that whoever wrote this article may have made the unilateral decision to put all authority names in brackets. This is not strictly correct. Those familiar with the Hyla species should edit the file if/where it is necessary to remove the brackets--GRM 21:49, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikispecies is where that convention seems to be going. As this is just an encyclopaedia, it doesn't really require it. We might end up doing something in the taxobox (that gives me an idea, just wait a bit) to indicate whether it was in the original genus, but otherwise it can be kept like this for now. Thanks. --liquidGhoul 00:55, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No it cannot. It is factually wrong. Best to remove this stuff to the taxobox entirely, it is a vandalism- and error-bait. Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 14:38, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Serious factual problems

The article states that the genus Hyla contains thirty-two species, but the list contains 40. Are many of these old scientific names? Additionally, the article states that Hylidae is a family of New World tree frogs, but then says that this genus contains species from the Old and New World. What's going on here? I'll do a few clarifications in the meantime. --Adamrush 15:40, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I too am confused, not only do the numbers not add up, but I'm not sure whether I should add the bird-voiced treefrog (Hyla avivoca) or not. Sarrandúin ^{[ Talk + Contribs ]} 21:31, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hyla visual identification

H. arborea
H. meridionalis
H. meridionalis (bad image name from the 80's ^-^)

Hello, according to eol website

H. arborea - green, dark line from the noze to the top of the legs.
H. meriodinalis - green, dark line from the noze to the shoulders.
??

But I'm not sure of this. Please, expert need ! Yug (talk) 22:15, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, in my opinion the identification of the third picture as a specimen of Hyla meridionalis is correct. The image's quality might be not the best, but you can see that the frog lacks a dark line at the body side. Moreover, the snout is rather long - longer than Hyla arborea normally has. Last not least, I know the author Michael Linnenbach as an expert in amphibians. -- Regards, Fice 08:53, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh... I understand. I noticed the similar shape, but I was astonished by the 3rd frog color (blue ! O.o), her thin look, and almost-missing black line from the nose to the shoulder.

But I now notice that vegetals are also blue, which is close to impossible. I conclude that the picture is just more blue than expected. Afterwhat : the 2nd image is probably a female, while the 3rd, yes, can be a male individu with a softer black line. If Michael Linnenbach can confirm, then I encourage to delete this misleading blue picture. Yug (talk) 16:27, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hello Yug,

this individuum is really Hyla meridionalis. Sorry this picture is digitally converted from a slide from the 1980-years. Hence the foto of the frog looks more blue as natural.

with kind regards Michael Linnenbach

Ok, noticed. Yug (talk) 19:14, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hyla. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/index.php.
Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20040827082534/http://www.amphibiaweb.org:80/ to http://amphibiaweb.org/.

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:31, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hyla. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071024033938/http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/index.php to http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/index.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:32, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]