Talk:Hydrophobicity scales/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

I am failing this GA nomination because the article clearly needs some work and no editor has attempted to do that during the review. I list below my preliminary comments. They were produced after a quick glance through the article, and thus the next reviewer should will have to read the text more rather than rely on those comments. Materialscientist (talk) 08:04, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1) References should contain a doi link. I would request to reformat all references into {{cite journal}} and other {{cite ..}} formats. Materialscientist (talk) 00:13, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2) The lead should be a summary of an article (presently it is not). With rare exceptions, the lead should not contain references. Instead, the notions of the lead should be expanded in the body text and that is where the references go. Materialscientist (talk) 00:13, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

3) A few-second look reveals abundant typos (capitalization, spacing, etc.). I usually fix them myself instead of pointing, but here are too many, and I would like to see some (sorry, yet missing) efforts from the nominator(s). Materialscientist (talk) 00:13, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

4) File:Different hydrophobicity scales.png should be set up as a wikitable. I shall provide help on tables and reference formatting if necessary. Materialscientist (talk) 00:13, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

5) "Kauzmann first stated that hydrophobic interactions are the most significant property of protein folding and stability" does not sound scientific (kind of "x first stated that water is liquid and that is why it is flowing").Materialscientist (talk) 00:19, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

6) Captions of File:Membrane proteins.gif and Quadruple_Hydrogen_Bond AngewChemIntEd_1998_v37_p75.jpg should properly explain what is shown there. In the latter case, molecules should be specified.