Talk:Hydrogen-bond catalysis

[Untitled]

The article should be renamed to enantioselective hydrogen bond catalysis? What is the difference with acid catalysis or organocatalysis? V8rik (talk) 21:27, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, although a lot of work has been done on asymmetric hydrogen bond donors, I think it's good to have a page on activation via hydrogen bonds in general. The amount of information on asymmetric catalysis is simply a consequence of a lot of catalysis work focusing in this area. I agree that maybe there should be more focus on mechanism of activation rather than just a list of too many examples of asymmetric catalysis. I will continue to add to the page accordingly, and I appreciate your feedback.

The way I understand it, although stronger hydrogen bonds can activate electrophiles by partial protonation or resemble general acid mechanism, hydrogen bond catalysis is a distinct field per se and should be considered a subfield of organocatalysis. For example, I don't think asymmetric protonation is considered a form of hydrogen bond catalysis, nor should anion-binding be considered an acid catalysis mechanism. The two concepts definitely share similarities though.

Perhaps after I add a bit more information, if people think it's necessary, we can consider redistributing the information among the several growing organocatalysis articles. For example, I see that someone had started a thiourea catalysis stub.Richard Liu (talk) 00:19, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Richard, thanks for your reply. The article is not about just proton catalysis or covalent catalysis as in organocatalysis in general. V8rik (talk) 21:09, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hydrogen-bond catalysis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:47, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stereochemistry of the asymmetric Michael addition

Hello chemists,

I think the stereochemistry of the product of first picture, which shows the "asymmetric Michael addition developed by Takemoto" of the page is wrong. I read a publication of Takemoto "Enantioselective Michael Reaction of Malonates to Nitroolefins Catalyzed by Bifunctional Organocatalysts" (J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 42, 12672-12673) in which he determined an enantiomeric excess of the other enantiomer.

Maybe someone else could check this too. I am pleased to hear your opinion.

The direct link to the publication: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ja036972z — Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.199.243.27 (talk) 01:10, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]