Talk:Hydrodynamic quantum analogs

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 17 December 2013 by reviewer Northamerica1000 (talk · contribs).

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Not Merge

About merge suggestion. Not merge: it is a "intersection area",

Hydrodynamics: the droplets and its behaviour are a hydrodynamic phenomena.
Quantum mechanics: the droplets can be used for modeling the quantum phenomena.
pilot-wave model: this is the central theme of the article... But not necessary to merge there.

--Krauss (talk) 17:50, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Missing content

In the "Stationary bouncing droplet", there is a mention of an "equation of motion" (at the end of the paragraph), but it is nowhere to be seen.

Similarly, a reference seems to be missing at the end of the "Walking droplet" section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.192.5.86 (talk) 14:03, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Two years later, the equation following "The first models the reaction force as a linear spring, leading to the following equation of motion:" is still missing. I'm unsure as to how to track this down. David Spector (talk) 14:31, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]